Post-Scarcity

In the so-called dark ages of middle England after Edward the Confessor had expelled the private money lending Ludean tribe (again) England enjoyed peak prosperity. A normal man only had to work 12 weeks a year to sustain a family of 10 for all their wants and needs. That's why massive fuck off cathedrals and churches were built in this period because men devoted themselves to pursuits for the greater good.

>because niggers
stopped reading right there

Shut up you word salad dick head.
Take your arbitrary twisting of Op's premise and drown yourself in Goldman Sach's cafeteria water dispenser.

even in star trek there was scarcity, for example dilithium.
human services will never be able to be post-scarcity.

A completely automated city that caters to every human need would be post scarcity.

There are no political problems, all problems are economic. You fix the economic problem by creating sovereign money owned by the commonwealth of the people in an Aristotlian democracy and you fix all problems over night.

Post-scarcity means not going without material 'needs' I.e food, shelter, healthcare, education and opportunities. It does not mean being able to select 57 different shapes and sizes of dildos. There's a different between wants and needs. The former is irrelevant while the latter can be achieved today.

>Is a post scarcity society possible? What would be the political repercussions of such a thing?
With a population well under 1.5 billion people it's easy game.

Fuck off Henry Kissinger, sorry I meant moron.

The problem is biological.
People would breed until resources became scarce again.
Fix that first.

It would require a non-existent technology to assemble molecules and an imaginable amount of energy. We are centuries away from post scarcity.