It's a strategy in which one side attempts to stress the other sides ability to wage war by destroying infrastructure and supply.
Damn straight. There is no reason a mere civilian should be allowed to own an ASSAULT weapon...
Bentley Rivera
Blake Miller
Not enough range.
Not enough magazine capacity.
Completely ineffective come the boogaloo.
Logan Lopez
Assault an "enemy"
Yes
Julian Hall
Need more pepermint schnapps
Benjamin Gomez
a garand lol
Bentley Gray
An armed uprising does not need to overthrow the government to be successful. All they would have to do is create a conflict that would be too costly to quell, thus government politicians would vote to meet the uprisings demands.
Vietnam was a great success for the military. They overwhelmingly destroyed N.Vietnamese forces, even with insane Rules of Engagement that greatly restricted their war fighting ability. Yet the US politicians still voted to end the war. It was simply too costly and politically inconveniently. Iraq, Afghanistan are also examples of the phenomenon.
US troops operated in Afghanistan with extremely restricted Rules of Engagement. They knew any civilian dead, innocent or not, would be a victory for the enemy. What makes you think the US military would operate with more relaxed RoE against US civilians? Now ask yourself this: what makes you think the military would be willing to fight rebels who are demographically from the same background as themselves? Why would they want to fight their brothers, father's, neighbors etc?
Cooper Allen
Please shoe me in the Constitution where it protects the right to CERTAIN arms. I'll wait....
Angel Young
>posts pic of a weapon of war claiming it isnt because it 'looks old'
>declares AR15s a 'weapon of war'
Name one war that utilized the AR15. Its okay, i'll wait
Landon Cooper
>Well REGULATED, as in under Government control can the people be allowed to bear arms
Imagine believing this retarded talking point. Have a (you)