Why end animal testing?
Socialism works
Caleb Brown
Jordan Morales
Because taking from the productive and giving to the unproductive erases any incentive for the productive to produce. Once the productive stops producing you’re Venezuela.
Hudson Walker
Everybody wants free tacos but nobody wants to make them for free
Money is not absolute. It is an abstraction of your productivity in exchange for someone else's productivity. Dumping money to people not producing anything for any long amount of time will lead to inflation for any item with an inelastic supply. Digital items have an elastic supply. They cost almost nothing to make a new copy. But things like luxury items, high quality food (all food really), real estate, high quality hookers etc all have a limited supply. The ones willing to put the most productivity in to getting the item will get it while others will be left wanting. Meanwhile if money was invested into the supply of goods more of the things and service you actually want can be supplied.
Lincoln Taylor
Jeremiah Nelson
Nah, network administrator in leafland working at a server house for Comcast (which doesn’t offer services in Canada), but this way everytime a Comcast subscribe uses the internet it pings out of country and the feds have every right to intercept and read ur communications. Burgers are retarded.
Brody Barnes
Because there are better alternatives?
Jace Fisher
Just use both.
Jeremiah Fisher
In other words multinational corporations should not reap the benefits of both free market societies and dictatorships. Right now they are not doing anything productive, they are just creating a lot of useless trinkets like phones and try to make you buy a new one each year. They do it cheaply with slave labor provided by dictatorship, while beneftting from laws from a non-dictatorship.
Start penalizing companies who do this and we can kiss the negative effects of globalisation goodbye. If Apple really wants that chink workforce so bad, then it should move to China like the chinklovers they are. Abusing dictatorships to gain an edge against local suppliers should be stopped. Since companies have the responsibility for their shareholders, they cannot stop themselves so governments have to do it. We already pay their bills if companies fail so its only right that tax-payers have some say in their shenanigans when things are looking good.
Brayden Lewis
the rich don't want the poor to see what they've been missing. they know once the poor get a taste of the life they've been living they will never give it up.
Aaron Mitchell
yeah just spend 500 billion every fucking month giving poor people 1,200