Obviously the answer is to ignore the red menace and hope they don't do it again. And that the next time its not worse.
P.S. Africa is full of wet markets too
Obviously the answer is to ignore the red menace and hope they don't do it again. And that the next time its not worse.
P.S. Africa is full of wet markets too
bio weapons expert disagrees
Malaria is a parasite and Sars-CoV-boogaloo bears no resemblance to it in the slightest.
Almost correct. The problem is that the article presents data but uses it to support a tangential hypothesis.
>This virus isn't ideal
doesn't only lend itself to the conclusion
>This virus is natural
There's a glaring conflict of interest here (either that or they're some UEA FdSc-tier shits), and they won't admit it
Yep. I saw a suggestion that we should start calling experts 'specialists' instead. It better conveys how narrow their expertise is, and reminds us that we shouldn't use them as a crutch to make all our decisions for us. Leaders with good sense are needed for that.
Summarize it faggot.
>he joined the science army and found himself holding a pike instead of riding a horse
sad!
chinese general disagrees
Americans start to realize how much of the news is fake and you get excited, oh shit maybe they can free themselves from tyranny. Nope. During the next crisis they believe what is given at the news podium 110% and they only cry "fake news" when the clown president is given a question he can't hand wave away with his signature boomer babble
>UEA FdSc
??????
Indians disagree