>confirm a negative
This is a fallacy that is pathological among the religious. "Refute my faith" is about as far from an effective argument that one could conceive.
If God is, as according to dogma, then he would already know you were to be forgiven from the moment of sin. No omnipotent, omniscient entity would require apology to influence its master plan. To say that prayer is effective is to say that man is capable of undermining the all-powerful. Notice the paradox
Were you to write a structure of law that needed to inspire others to spread it for you, wouldn't you write things into it like that, too? I would.
see
Totally hilarious, though
Religion is a way for low IQ beta cuck nigger faggots to rationalize their meaningless existence.
Their motto: "It's God's plan" == I'm a fucking worthless, incompetent, ineffectual, piece of literal shit.
This isn't an argument. I'm not the one pushing a narrative.
Most Christians are excited to die, though. I know I am, and I would be a martyr if God wants me to be one.
>A cornerstone so impossible to remove even the best efforts from the greatest minds of generations cant manipulate the mindset
Ya'know even if atheists think religiousfags believe a lie, you have to atleast consider the fact that they're not putting their faith in man but a higher power. Doing this makes you less docile to man, you choose to serve God instead even if you dont fully understand God's motives. All of this neatly wrapped around the fact that godless men are acting just like satan and reinforces their beliefs.
Its pretty funny, satanists are disgusting. You need to serve someone, might as well serve the creator of your reality.
>please read my gay post again, I'm trying to narrate the debate
I can shitpost and speak in earnest at the same time. You're starting to come across as somewhat of a fedorafag.
>How can a judicial system that wrongly convicts an innocent man, or, similarly, fails to convict a guilty man be reconciled?
This is a complex question. I'd participate in that thread for sure, but this isn't it.
If I understand you, and please correct me if I'm wrong, is that god's law is flawless, and no one innocent has ever been punished under god's laws?
I didn't ever say that humanity was flawless, for the record.
Atheism is a coping mechanism.
>We can't know a god, if one exists. We can't prove or disprove the existence of a deity.
So why act like there's nothing?
>they become irate
Because it's a strawman?
>Why do those who believe in something feel it's their responsibility to push their beliefs on me?
Maybe because you'd be happier?
>Why can I not just live as I wish without interference?
That's how we ended up with transgender children.
>Why should one man's personal rules affect my own?
Because my values are grounded in something besides "muh feelings" and "muh dick" - i.e., a God.
>Objective arguments only.
Objectively, if there is no God, then you have no basis for your position, and it is preference. If there is a God, it is our duty to correct you. Either way, religion is necessary.