>This isn't a secular cult btw
Are there any actual unironic literal communists on Yas Forums?
You are not a communist if you're '''against''' dividing people by class.
>Unironic communist on Pol
Only Pol pot lovers.
Case closed
Just post a landlord containment thread
>burger
>doesn’t understand class interests
I... oh well... you know what... forget it... there is no hope for you
Communism simply has not, nor ever will work in a sovereign nation. At least fascism has worked in countries before the west decided to fight it. Communism leads to bread lines while fascism leads a wealthy and proud nation.
I am not against dividing people based on their class, specifically based on if they produce, or if they leech on other people's production. However, I am saying that there are other, equally valid ways to divide people, and that they are very common and people act on them. Class identity is much weaker than ethnic identity right now, in the USA. The Democratic party elections showed as much, it was basically a census on class struggle vs identity politics.
You sound like a neoliberal weasel. Sure you're totally a communsit except you really care about these other issues.
Go back to supporting the 'revolution' of Bernie Sanders.
Lieber tot als rot.
If you work to make money, you are working class.
If your money makes money, you are not working class.
The worker in question would have his one single share confiscated, and be a worker. His landlord would have all his property confiscated, and be a worker too. Except an unemployed homeless worker, since he never really worked, his money was just making him money.
Protip: your favorite rockstar is a worker, and his (probably poorer than him) manager is not a worker. Its not about wealth, its about how you source your wealth.