Do you agree with the Georgia Guidestones that we should “balance personal rights with social duties”?

Make them walk the plank?

Yes, there is literally nothing wrong with the guidstones

>“balance personal rights with social duties”
This is common sense that even the founders would agree with. Only the most hardcore an-cap would have a problem with this.

And we should limit the human population. This one really gets peoples panties in a twist. But you can do it without having to kill anybody. There are humane ways to practice eugenics. Just limit the number of children nondesirables can have. That easy.

Based

Depends on the social duties, for instance
>My personal right to own firearms is tied to the social duty of maintaining order and safety in my community
>my personal right to free speech is tied to the social duty of reporting issues and problems
Overall I think the GGs are nothing more that statist drivel but we'll never know because the patron is unknown

Attached: 1583462245527.jpg (900x1199, 315.55K)

>Just limit the number of children undesirables can have.
Here's a dilemma, who is desirable and undesirable? and who gets to decide?

>(((Georgia Guidestones)))

if by balance you mean hang, and if by personal rights and social duties you mean bankers, then I agree in minecraft

Yes, which is why we should have way more personal rights than we currently do because the “imbalance” is not in the direction that statist bootlickers think it is.

I believe the guidestones should be mowed down and destroyed.

Where does murdering 7 billion people fall?
Fuck the guidestones, they are a literal monument to the stupidity of ideas like peak oil. Take the current capacity, for no good reason claim that is now the max capacity. Make predictions of doom based on the idea that we are at out peak in terms of energy production and use resource exploitation and human innovation. Demand 7 billion (and counting) people be killed off to be sustainable.