It’s not a fallacy. We are on a slippery slope into chaos.
How is this a logical fallacy?
It's a logical fallacy in the absence of additional information connecting the steps.
Of course this is often abused to reject arguments even when such additional information is provided.
Sounds right.
what happens in between is that the overton window shifts and suddenly 'A' being okay makes 'B' something to consider and discuss, now that 'A' is out of the way.
slippery slopes exist everywhere.
>they want to gay at straight people
>they gay at straight people
>if we encourage them to gay
>they will gay at us more
People would say its slippery slope and by your definition it isnt.
>cause and effect
>logical fallacy
???
How is "No True Scotsman" a fallacy? According to the UK government, Pakistanis are no less Scottish than Scots.
Does that mean if you refuse to refer to muzzie rape gangs as a Scottish issue, that you are simply wrong?
The pakis call themselves Scottish when the cameras are rolling, and their government will have you arrested if you dare to say that they are NOT Scottish in public.
are those kids in the lower right corner that thing is "spraying" at?
it's a fallacy fallacy. Just because something is a 'fallacy' doesn't mean it isn't true.
When saying ''earthquakes are caused by homosexuality'' that is a fallacy.
Claiming ''pedophile homosexuals are pushing for homosexual rights because they eventually want to change the age of consent'' appears to be a slippery slope, but is infact just correctly predicting intent in the context of large-scale-politics involving large population numbers.
Slippery slopes tend to be true but some justification is needed. Most people would still claim the fallacy regardless. They love to hammer this stuff in college.