How is this a logical fallacy?

How is this a logical fallacy?
Hasn't society been on a slippery slope throughout most of human civilization?
Legalizing gay marriage led to people being more tolerant of fags, which led to fags in assless chaps walking down the street sucking on dildos and squirting makeshift semen on children.
Seems to me the case of criminalizing homosexuality would hold ground knowing where its tolerance could eventually end up.

Attached: modsequalfags.png (274x177, 62.28K)

>That cock sucking cum sucking post
You're on a slippery slope user.

You would need to explain how OI would get from a to b. What happens in between. It won’t happen immediate but it will probably gradually happen.

Is a slippery slope towards worse logical fallacies.

>and squirting makeshift semen on children.
case in point

Attached: fagsbeingfags.gif (475x787, 3.66M)

Fuck this gay earth

its called progress. It will arrive from b through the reasoning that led to the conclusion of a.
the reasoning will not stop, the culture that gave rise to a happening will not stop, hence we will get to b. the causal relationship goes without saying, or when it is said it is disregarded and ignored.

I mean the idea is right but the reassigning is retarted. You would be better off slowly getting to the consequence rather than right away. Then again, this is how I think about it when it comes to essays.

There is no such thing as logical fallacies. They're only used by people not interested in conversation. No sentence have any exact meaning so muh logical fallacy is just a way for the opposition to pretend he won instead of seeking truth.

*reasoning
Phone fag