what's the correlation coefficient?
Why does your graph look like a dated jitter plot?
No correlation between wealth and IQ
>I'm pretty sure wealthy people have higher IQs on average
There's no proof.
>this data set could include inheritance and what not to cloud results
These ARE the results, and it's whole lot of noise, with no correlation.
If there is correlation, why is everything beyond absolute stupidity just noise?
251537362
>heh, if you arbitrarily remove the data points that support a trend you'll destroy the trend
>heh
the absolute state of IQ denialists
>Wealth cuts off at 230k
>IQ cuts off at 130
This is basically saying that the average is the average, literally, fuck off.
>Jack Ma
Jack Ma only managed to get into a 3rd rate university after several attempts at passing the Chinese version of the SAT. He graduated college at 24. Jack Ma is not that intelligent.
IQ does not really mean all that much out in the corporate world. It's about connections and knowing the right people.
IQ does matter for getting into the right schools which helps you make connections. IQ without the networking will not lead to a higher salary. In fact a high IQ without the network to back it up will just lead to getting work dumped on you. You might get a 4% raise at the end of the year if your manager is feeling generous.
Do you understand I named to borderline tards that managed to get rich don't you?
>Why does your graph look like a dated jitter plot?
BECAUSE IT'S SHOWING THAT WEALTH HAS NO CORRELATION TO IQ, YOU PRETENTIOUS MORON.
Where's the trend exactly?
For all the retarded claims that will turn up in the thread
Boomer sociopaths have all the wealth, so yes, neoliberalism is sick. Neolib isn't the only form of capitalism though.
im wealthy but sub 70iq