Is it even remotely possible to be moral and not religious?

Religion separates us from them, making "them" less than human and easier to kill. Learn2humanmorality.

What do you define as "bad things"?

user very succinct, this the blessing and curses are results of algorithmic behavior played out over time, the amazing part is with Christ becoming man, man then participated not just in good boy point but the untreated grace of unlimited creativity that is God energy, that why the jew hates Christ because they wanted to stop at being better that niggers rather than being godly and humble like Christ which is real power, true low time preference is living for eternity

Morals predate organized religion and are the product of evolution. Morals existed long before modern religions existed, even before religion itself existed when humans were primitive. Other species display traits of altruism and other morality as well.
The idea that morality is mutually exclusive to religion is simply put not supported by evidence.

The Christian concept of morality is centered around mankind and the earth being fallen seperated from God, Sin is an illness that we all have and without Gods intervention morality is simply a vain concept that leads to the state we see the world in today.

>ayys god becomes impossible to fathom for me

Me too, give it some time and keep chasing it.

ayys pokes his finger in to your bubble and say hello.

It's hard to make out what it is, one thing I'm convinced of is it's cross temporal. Meaning that past, present and future is the same thing for this organism, and I believe it's our ancestor.

Knowledge of it replicates like genetic material does. And so we are actively learning more about God in the same way the sperm does climbing up the vagina.

Wait, you mean everything around us is a common ancestor to us?

Yes my Son and I'm right here.

Attached: jesus_saves_those_who_dont_know_they_are_drowning.jpg (646x960, 145.84K)

That's only one side of the equation. Those who love God want to do things according to His will. That doesn't mean we always succeed, much like any relationship. But since most atheists on this board are incel edgelords, they don't get that concept. The best they can do as far as love goes is infatuation with a twitch thot that turns them into a total and complete simps who open their wallets out of what they think is love.

But spiritual love, shared with God or a person you are in a deep committed relationship with, means something totally different. It means cleaning up puke and shit when they are sick at 3am. It means buying tampons. It means being willing to lay down your life for your loved ones if it comes to it. Taking a bullet to save others. On a higher level, that's the meaning of John 3:16.

You have to start by knowing love of yourself and love of others before you can grasp the concept of the love for God. If you haven't done that, you are just not going to get it. It's far more than bing good because you expect a reward.

That's that shallow twitch thot love y'all are used to.

Yes
youtu.be/OxiAikEk2vU

An atheist can behave morally
An atheist however cannot provide an explanation for the obvious existence of objective morality

Yes, you can reject religion and still follow the moral imperatives of that religion. However, those moral imperatives would not exist without religion. For example muslims rape children and kill women for embarrassing thier fathers. The reason you find that morally wrong is because you grew up in a country founded on Christian principles.

I feel the same way, but for me it manifests in thinking about what aspects of Roman pagan rituals were appropriated by the Catholic Church