Burger you are retard and it shows. The amount of killing Capitalism and Imperialism have achieved has always been with the help of "traitors" of the other country, meaning that your beloved systems does kill people in the same country wich has been applied. Going further, you point out the obvious Wich is that countries have to choices. To either submit to foreign powers and get killed and plundered but them with help of some traitorous class. This is somehow acceptable in a burgers head, because is ok if capitalism do it.
The other choice is to do a revolution and reset the system, where your people will pay a cost for getting rid of feudal rule and foreign domination.
Both mean dead people, but in one you are bitch and in the other you are not.
Why do communists support this monster who killed 60 million people?
Oops, my mistake. Thanks for the correction.
I said that the 94 million number was bullshit as well. But y'all can't cite your own propaganda correctly, spewing out numbers such as "100 million!" "130 million!" "1 trillion!!!!"
Again:
thegrayzone.com
Under Chairman Mao’s 27-year rule of China, the country went from a population of 540 million in 1949 to at least 700 million and possibly as high as 940 million (according to some sources) in 1976.
Given this mass population growth in such a short period of time, it is unlikely that so many people were killed under Mao’s rule.
Ruling a country where 4 in 5 people was an illiterate rural peasant,
Mao was able to reduce the national illiteracy rate to just 7%. In an era where few Chinese lived past the age of 35, Mao was able to increase the life expectancy to at least 55.
If Mao had so many people killed, he would not be able to achieve these things, especially as China was isolated from the world as North Korea today.
Nah, Hitler was a socialist. Goebbels was also a socialist. They had a different way of achieving the world revolution but they were socialists nonetheless.
>no one died under communism
ok tankie
why don't you just fucking kill yourself?
Yeah, that's an error on my part. I meant to attribute Courtois but they're both anti-communist propagandists so I sometimes get them mixed up, the point still remains the same.
> trump licking children in cages.
is this the new spastic claim?
those pics of "children in cages" are fucking FAKE faggot.
when illegals get caught and are sent to a detention center, ICE holding facility or a local jail WE DONT SEND THEIR KIDS WITH THEM
when a tweaker gets busted making meth in his garage, he, and his old lady BOTH go to jail, but they go to separate jails, and their kids are NOT sent to jail with them.
kids go to juvenile facilities where they are detained (if criminally charged for shit), they are then placed with their un-incarcerated family, or a group home or foster family.
unlike glorious mexico, we dont lock whole families up in prisons because daddy was a meth dealer or mommy was a prostitute. what do you propose be done with minors who have parents in jail? should they be left on the street?
perhaps a workhouse or orphanarium like a fucking dickens novel?
youre a smoothbrained faggot.
kids in detention are held for a day or two, until family or other placement can be found for them. they arent kept in fucking dog cages.
The hell? I'm not saying no one died under socialism: nazis died under socialism, landlords died under socialism, bourgeois scum died under socialism, royalty died under socialism.
There were some mistakes that led to some deaths, but not nearly as many as the Black Book of Communism suggests.