Jej, not evidence
How convenient
Jej, not evidence
How convenient
Pics or GTFO faggot
Of course I disagree
If there were irrefutable empirical evidence would that change anything?
proof of free will, thanks
>You cannot have any dialogue or discussion at all. And nobody is able to live this conviction to its ultimate extant. So if I were to say that my opinion that you deserve to be shot is equally valid as your pleas for life.
I don't understand what you mean with your first statement. Changes in morality being affected by public opinion can be historically proven. See honorable fealty, causal murder or the lower classes, and what people used to do to animals for fun in the Dark Ages for examples of things people used to not take issue with. I can provide more examples if you are somehow okay with all those things.
If you thought it morally correct to shoot someone for no reason, I would argue that your morality is shit and different from pretty much all of common consensus, and possibly indicative of insanity. But not that it violates a certain religious tenement. Secular morality exists.
So prove it.
It would be bad news for the bad guys. You’d be crazy not to choose the path of light. All but the end of free will.
if you understand the notion(you don't), it's not a matter of any complex evidence, but rather of necessity, countless arguments have been proposed to help people like you grasp it but it's a fools errand
the argument from the Aristotelian distinction between act/potency and the "evidence" of the ever changing nature of things would perhaps be one of the most basic ones, but nowadays every teenager thinks he had debunked 3000 years of metaphysics
I personally define the soul as the body's electrical current.