Imagine how different the world would be if "they" just let him into art school

If only the Jews had let him do his finger paintings.

Art school then was about who you knew. Art school now is about how much you've got. Still, a lot could have been avoided.

"Art"

Attached: 1583372591345.jpg (1952x2760, 702.08K)

The treaty of versailles was fucking germany, if not hitler then someone else. Who’s to say hitler was even the worst possible option?
Coulda had someone who wasn’t an autist and actually turned the world into a nazi hellhole

Who killed captain alex, $200 budget, shitty camera
There’s no excuse, if negroes can do it, you cando it

The problem was not Hitler's skills. It was the fact that the University was leaning more towards the new and "hip" abstract art form. He certainly had a lot of room to improve, but he was by no means a terrible artist.

Attached: hitler-art-art_1602650c.jpg (460x288, 18.39K)

I mean maybe? His style of art wasn't in vogue at the school.
That too.

Not even remotely the truth. A Negro won the Nobel Prize for Economics, can you do that?

Attached: Arthur_Lewis_(Nobel_photo).jpg (265x374, 13.4K)

would've made no difference. they let AOC do a meme degree, she's still on the Stalin career path.

It's hard not to laugh at how universally fascists and communists both agree that art must be stale, emotionless, impersonal and uninspiring, lest it become "evil" or "subversive". Personally I think Hitler's technique was pretty sound, but you can see his egotism showing in thinking that his work needs to be treated as actual art. The pieces are completely devoid of anything personal or emotional, they're very objective and don't express anything. I think Hitler really could have done well in life had he chose to applies his skills to practical illustrations, like models, blueprints, diagrams. The kind of objective style he has is extremely good for these kind of applications.

The main problem just boils down to the fact that commies and fascists probably don't actually believe art is actually real at all. I would guess deep down they mostly believe art is just stuff you put up everywhere to remind people what to think and believe.

Attached: galaofthespheres.jpg (600x794, 86.9K)

Yes
>economics
Go back to gold

Why did Hitler want to go to art school? Why not get a useful degree in STEM?

this isn't babby's first art class we're talking about, you don't get into an exclusive graduate level state-funded art program in the 1910s with this shite

Attached: utter shite.jpg (460x288, 34.75K)

Give me a concise and educated opinion in your own words for why the gold standard was a better system.

See here

Also, post your artwork.

Hitler obviously had some talent but his art is fucking boring and lame. I certainly wouldn't hang any of his art on my walls.

Attached: artsy adolf.jpg (800x573, 53.96K)

Oy vey delete this

Really, how can you not hate the jews?

funny enough that might actually be the one good use for it. It's so mundane and inoffensive you could easily hang it anywhere without a second thought.

he was just a student. Imagine what he could have achieved with proper education and support.

Because the value of the currency was based on something real rather than "it's worth this much because I say it is"

he's not going for one of those styles, is he?
he's being a mediocre realist. he would be unskilled whatever style he trained on.
why do you labor under the impression that artistic talent qualifies one for artistic discrimination?
sounds retarded.

>I certainly wouldn't hang any of his art on my walls.
Speak for yourself. It would be a great way to hide your power level from normies while dog-whistling to bros.

Why is that necessarily better, though? Gold was not really inherently valuable until pretty recently when we started using it to conduct electricity. So it's based on the price of something that isn't actually valuable.

Imagine if there was a diamond-backed currency, would you support that?

Germans were either doctors or failures.

jews had other plans for him

>2020
>Still believing the meme that Hitler was mad at Jews for not getting into art school, convinced the whole population Jews are evil and then cremated 6 million of them
This story makes sense if you're still in high school, but come on

>Imagine if there was a diamond-backed currency, would you support that?
I would not, simply because the value of diamonds is artificially inflated by Jews hoarding and not being honest about how many diamonds there are in the world. Gold however, is a pretty great precious metal and has historically been used to trade. It doesn't tarnish, is easy to work, and is pretty.
Because it isn't useful for a wide variety of things compared to steel, iron, or copper, gold can be more easily relegated to a store of wealth.

Attached: 1585072586834.jpg (500x617, 54.25K)

Hitlers art is basical bad depictions of things that exist, there is nothing thought provoking about them.
It's Bob Ross shit, HURR draw the pretty mountain, DURR draw the pretty lake

So then you're just stuck with someone that tries to paint photorealistically but fails.

Just by looking at the guy below Hitler, you can tell that he's a superior draftsman, look how effectively he captures expressions and poses with just some quick scribbles and coarse paints.
He purposely gives them contorted poses and ogroid features, if you do not like that then it's up to your taste, do not infer that something is bad art because it does not have a 1:1 relationship with reality.

Go back to Hitlers old woman and naked dude, really look at them and notice the uncanny valley effect of the accumulated wrongs.
It's laughable, the woman is like BABBYS FIRST CHARCOAL DRAWING.
Compare with the Vitruvian man or something like that, from a guy that actually did know human anatomy and perspective.

Hitler never was any good artist, nor was he an interesting artist.

But that's my point, gold is valuable because we give it value. So it's not any more actually concrete than fiat currency.

You do realize modern art is just a giant scam for moneylaubdering, right?
I cant believe you are dumb enough to actually believe all that pretentious horseshit

How about a currency based on rolls of Charmin toilet paper?

Well put

Attached: 1558910034657.jpg (500x492, 25.79K)

>You don't like Hitler's art?! What, an spaghetti-O vag art is better?!?
Jesus Christ you fucking autist, there is an entire UNIVERSE of shit between those two.

you mean nazi paradise

Fucking aye, bot, if I could physically choke your programming code until you sputter out of existance, I would in a nanosecond.

's post is basically bad descriptions of things that exist, there is nothing thought provoking about them.
It's leaf shit, HURR post the BBC thread, DURR reply to the slide thread

So then you're just stuck with someone that tries to post ironically but fails.

Just by looking at the guy below, you can tell that he's a superior shitposter, look how effectively he captures degeneracy and decadence with just some quick screenshots and MS Paints.
He purposely gives them FBI crime stats and Jewish last names, if you do not like that then it's up to your taste, do not infer that something is bad shitposting because it does not have a 1:1 relationship with a loli.

Go back to 250094537's old roastie and naked simp, really look at them and notice the jpeg artifacting effect of the accumulated wrongs.
It's laughable, the roastie is like BABBYS FIRST TINDER SCREENSHOT.
Compare with the Virgin vs Chad meme or something like that, from a guy that actually did know optics and perspective.

250094537 was never a good poster, nor was he an interesting propagandist.

Attached: 1584771679319.png (246x357, 106.86K)

"Mediocre artist"
There's no such thing. There's only those who don't have experience and those who do. This here is a sketch by Monet, does this mean he's a mediocre artist? Certainly not.
>why do you labor under the impression that artistic talent qualifies one for artistic discrimination?
Because you don't understand the sheer amount of time and effort it takes to get to that drawing level, especially back then.

Attached: Clark_04_2006_5_2000.jpg (960x624, 103.49K)

Except that you can’t just print more gold in times of crisis

you've ignored a lot of responses
that's an incredible sketch
>you have to be good at something to judge it
still bullshit

You god damn fucking nimrod, of course we give it value, we give everything a level of value! Gold has just always been given a certain value above other resources because of some """mystical""" reason. Whatever the case, people always want to have gold which means it serves as the perfect resource to base money on.

Why not base money off an actually valuable resource, like lithium or something.

the style in vogue was retarded ugly sculptures made of garbage

>like lithium or something.

>dangerous
>difficult to mine
>difficult to handle
>gets consumed and used up by everything we use it for
This is what zoomer-era Canadian education looks like, everyone.

Attached: IMG_20200319_233959.png (872x499, 397.54K)

You picked out seemingly insignificant flaws in his work without any consideration to the amount of time and effort it took to actually make it which is exactly how artists get discouraged. Your criticism isn't constructive it's just nitpicking. I believe that he, just like any other person out there in the world with the same ambition, would have greatly improved if given the chance but he was shut out because of favoritism toward the new age garbage that was coming into their university and becoming the new norm.

>gets consumed and used up by everything we use it for
>naturally controls inflation
Checkmate nerd

Plus, we have no way of knowing how long Lithium will be valuable. It's not like coal is particularly valuable anymore, and a currency based on that would be equally retarded. With gold we at least all understand that it is desirable and will be until the end of time (barring asteroid and planetoid mining in the far future).

why not base it on the value of silicon then

comically bad take from the memeflag, none of the other artists are good or interesting, they're all shit by every metric unless you're deliberately being a contrarian faggot.
in a non-weimar civilisation perhaps Hitler wouldn't have been accepted into a prestigious art school either, it takes enormous numbers of middling to competent artists like he was to produce those of genius. in the weimar age he lived in however he was in every way superior to the stupid fuckwits that were being pushed into prominence, and the only way you're able to argue otherwise is by having your head miles up your own ass.

More like wildly fluctuates the entire economy. If you think petrodollar currency models are unstable, lithium would be just as bad or worse. At least oil is used at a consistent rate. What happens when no one buys a smart phone that year? Or when some technology previously reliant on lithium makes it worthless?

Attached: IMG_20200213_172515.jpg (750x750, 53.85K)

In a just world hitler could have sold his paintings and jewish money laundering schemes would go bust.

Base it on the value of white pussy

The path of the true artist is akin to the warrior. The warrior creates new context through his mastery of physical situations in war. The artist creates new contexts through his creative engagement with the world and his own subconscious.

Both paths involve immense danger for the practitioner if he is to be true to his calling.

whiteartcollective.com/about

I hope you lurkers are paying attention to this fag. This is how you troll/slide a thread.

Attached: IMG_20200210_114704.jpg (582x427, 40.43K)

Completely worthless

the answer to this is what I already said. he was looking to get into an exclusive, funded program, graduate-level program. high school skills need not apply. he didn't "deserve" a chance, nobody does, because there's a limited supply of prestigious graduate level art school placements.
grow up, faggot.