>But you smooth brained ape people shouldn't be breeding anyway
And yet those types breed the most anyway. Intelligence doesn't mean much if you get replaced because you couldn't even stand up to your women.
Reminder: If you are an intelligent male you are increasingly less likely to find a woman who is your intellectual...
I would rather have tsundere gf who beats people with a riding crop
If you are concerned with somebody remembering mistakes you made, then you are making too many, or very fucking idiotic ones.
My wife is dumb as bricks at times.
However she is loyal, loving, generous, a great housewife and a 10/10 mother.
I literally do fuck all around the house other than minor repairs and the lawn. She accepts this and is happy because I bust my balls to earn a decent wage to keep our two boys and the two of us in a comfortable lifestyle.
I love her a lot.
143 here. If memory serves it's something like 200 to 1 (or was it 20 to 1?) M to F ratio here. But since this is about 99th percentile, if you want the female portion they're 1 in 4000 or something. So if you're not dating a very skewed subset of the population, you'll never churn through enough dates to find one reliably in a given lifetime.
this. I married a high IQ female. she turned out to be a total psycho bitch that destroyed my life.
good, then you can fuck her and have a bunch of genius inbred children.
That sounds very wholesome actually :)
Though you should probably remove porn pics like the one you posted and stop looking at other naked women that your wife imo.
IQ works only below 100. You won't tell difference between 120 and 140, it's not something that give you some secret smart boost out of nowhere, you need to educate yourself and work on improving. However you can always tell when someone is sub100, not amount of learned knowledge can change it.
>Why is it bad to take both the husband and the wife’s opinion in consideration... Women have opinions too you know.
The wife can always offer an opinon. They usually do. But any pretence at equality will lead to resentment at being overruled. In what relationship is resentment a useful or healthy state of affairs? She has to accept that her opinions might be heard, but the decision will belong to the husband exclusively.
>Some women are good leaders just like some men are good leaders. But in general most men and women aren’t good at leading.
No. History is an excellent catalogue of women failing to lead in any circumstance, barring the rarest and most fringe cases. Groups comprised of women/led by women do not become self-sustaining and stable, but instead collapse. This stems from the female imperative that any conflict is dealt with by exclusion and ostracism. This is not how men deal with conflict.
>That has literally nothing to do about the fact that a marriage should be a partnership
You are wrong. Sexual archetypes are extremely useful in gauging what women really want. And what women really want, what they dream about in the privacy of their own head, is not equality or leadership.
>There’s one of marriages were the wife is the smarter and more responsible one
Those women failed in finding a man whom they could look up to. Infidelity in such relationships is common.
>Also there’s tons of cruel men out there you know and also huge power imbalances tend to naturally lead to the person in power being cruel, I think that the Sanford prison experiment proved this.
Nobody can pretend to be something they are not for longer than a month. Women are shrewd judges of character. Keep your legs shut for cruel men if you don't like it. The surprising fidelity a battered wife has for her spouse indicates that controlling/abusive partners satisfy a primal attraction drive, albeit in an unhealthy fashion.