Reminder: If you are an intelligent male you are increasingly less likely to find a woman who is your intellectual equal (not that even smart roasties select for intelligence anyway)
Of course, this is the same on the opposite side of spectrum too.
But you smooth brained ape people shouldn't be breeding anyway
Im 180 IQ and my sister is 160, get fucked you sexist midwit untermensch.
If you look to your mate for intellectual fulfillment, you'll usually end up disappointed
Submissiveness is way more important than intelligence. I tell my girlfriend everything she needs to know. She may be dumb, but she's never given me any lip.
>My sister is dumber than me, thus proving OP's point
Go take a chopper ride, commie.
Highly intelligent female partners are overrated
Find yourself a good mother with decent intelligence and wisdom
125 iq here
I only date jewess who attend some form of graduate school. haven’t been happier
take the khazar pill
125 isn't high
This. The perfect woman knows one thing. Love and compassion. For children. She knows what her husband tells her because she really doesn't care. The only thing she cares about is living her children and her husband
It's like 5th percentile
What do you define as being “submissive”?
>She knows what her husband tells her because she really doesn't care.
Why should she do what her husband tells her to and not have any opinions of her own???
You're both basement dwelling losers that have never held a conversation with a girl that wasn't one of your 2D fantasies. Women have personalities too, but ofcourse you wouldn't know because all your experience with girls comes from hentai, anime and porn. Women are more than just a mobile hole you disgusting freaks, they're not slaves whose entire existence revolves around your recessed penis, Jesus Christ you virgins must have had a really fucked childhood to write the shit you do on here.
This, though don’t shame them for being virgins that’s just cruel.
Holy shit roasties seething
Nothing against virgins but bitter incels deserve to be mocked and derided if they think they're owed anything other than having their identities leaked and names forever tarnished for being societal deviants. Blaming women for problems that stem from within their putrid selves is hypocrisy of the highest order and deserves to be called out.
Fair enough, but I just think it’s bad to use virgin as an insult I guess. And yeah, incels tend to blame women for problems that they themselves have caused and they’re projecting on the highest level desu. And I agree that it defiantly deserves to be called out.
Archetypal women for sexual selection usually emphasise physical attractiveness, kindness and faithfulness. No man gives a fraction of a damn whether the woman in question is as dumb as a rock or not if the aforementioned qualities are satisfied.
I’m dating a rather intelligent woman. But she’s still a woman so it means she’s basically a retard.
>If you are an intelligent male you are increasingly less likely to find a woman who is your intellectual equal
I don't care High school dropout is OK for my.
Some men seem to care about intelligence though I think.
>But she’s still a woman so it means she’s basically a retard.
What do you mean by that??
>my.
See
>Of course, this is the same on the opposite side of spectrum too.
>But you smooth brained ape people shouldn't be breeding anyway
I don't want my intellectual equal. I want an attractive, faithful, obedient women who knows about to care for children, cook and clean, and please me.
Most men probably don't want their intellectual equal. It's females that desire this trait.
Sure thing mensafag
>Women have personalities too
Should I just filter all memeglags?
What do you mean by “obedient”?
Don’t you think women have personalities...
It is possible that guys with an IQ of 150+ would struggle to tolerate a wife who was IQ 90. That gap is akin to normal people trying to have a meaningful/productive conversation with a person afflicted with Down's Syndrome. Beyond this sort of gap, guys really don't care. A pleasant and caring disposition outweighs a university degree.
>Women are more than just a mobile hole
They also cook, clean and wash dishes. Based.
Had 6 years with a clinical psychologist gf, hellscape of arguments and her trying to be alpha. Now got a qt submisssive wife and peaceful life.
Okidoki
>submisssive
What do you mean when you say submissive? If you mean that she’s not supposed to disagree with you on anything and she doesn’t get to make any decisions then that’s gross.
standard deviation is 15
115 IQ = higher than 68% of people
130 IQ = higher than 95% of people
>obediant wife
A marriage cannot be a democracy. One partner will always have the casting vote on decisions. Women do not deal with leadership well and lack fundamental qualities/approaches that create stable hierarchies. Plus, archtypal male stereotypes as evidenced in female pornography/erotic literature indicate that the ideal man is a leader, not a follower. Women don't daydream about being in charge - they dream of following.
Nigger im a virgin too, but it has never once in all my life crossed my mind to look for some bullshit like "submissiveness" in any female for a potential girlfriend, ever. Post gen Z is a goner.
>inb4 hes only lived fourteen years
It's important to care about intelligence for the sake of your children. But find a woman that has a good memory. Female intelligence if mostly about memory, not raw congnitive force. Memory helps with all things related to children and making them feel loved.
Looking for submissiveness is some Gen X bullshit. That user is an ugly, fat, balding 50 year old, guaranteed.
Gen X is another generation that should get the rope or coronachan.
>wanting to date a women on your level.
They are holes whose purpose is to raise kids, take care of the house and cook. They evolved to be less intelligent and should be so or they won't fulfill those purposes, like you can't get a genius to be a trash man.
t. high iq male.
>A marriage cannot be a democracy. One partner will always have the casting vote on decisions.
Why is it bad to take both the husband and the wife’s opinion in consideration... Women have opinions too you know.
>Women do not deal with leadership well and lack fundamental qualities/approaches that create stable hierarchies.
Some women are good leaders just like some men are good leaders. But in general most men and women aren’t good at leading.
>Plus, archtypal male stereotypes as evidenced in female pornography/erotic literature indicate that the ideal man is a leader, not a follower. Women don't daydream about being in charge - they dream of following.
That has literally nothing to do about the fact that a marriage should be a partnership were both the husband and the wife should listen to each other’s opinions. There’s one of marriages were the wife is the smarter and more responsible one so I think it would be dumb even if you said that a marriage shouldn’t be a democracy that it should be automatically the husband who only decides things. Also there’s tons of cruel men out there you know and also huge power imbalances tend to naturally lead to the person in power being cruel, I think that the Sanford prison experiment proved this.
>but it has never once in all my life crossed my mind to look for some bullshit like "submissiveness" in any female for a potential girlfriend, ever
That’s good to hear :)
I think the guys who look for that are typically men who tend to be insecure or people who are genuinely sadistic and want someone who’s easy to abuse.
Women are people, not holes and on average men and women are just as intelligent.
And also remembering every single mistake you have made
I would much prefer an agreeable, caring wife, than an intelligent shrew who compulsively argues with me on every topic. Very intelligent women will only be happy with more intelligent men, as a rule. Very successful/intelligent women struggle to maintain relationships because the ability to destroy him in arguments and decision-making in turn erodes all respect. If she's not looking up to you, she's looking around for 'next'.
Women are for breeding, not for intellectual discussion.
>But you smooth brained ape people shouldn't be breeding anyway
And yet those types breed the most anyway. Intelligence doesn't mean much if you get replaced because you couldn't even stand up to your women.
I would rather have tsundere gf who beats people with a riding crop
If you are concerned with somebody remembering mistakes you made, then you are making too many, or very fucking idiotic ones.
My wife is dumb as bricks at times.
However she is loyal, loving, generous, a great housewife and a 10/10 mother.
I literally do fuck all around the house other than minor repairs and the lawn. She accepts this and is happy because I bust my balls to earn a decent wage to keep our two boys and the two of us in a comfortable lifestyle.
I love her a lot.
143 here. If memory serves it's something like 200 to 1 (or was it 20 to 1?) M to F ratio here. But since this is about 99th percentile, if you want the female portion they're 1 in 4000 or something. So if you're not dating a very skewed subset of the population, you'll never churn through enough dates to find one reliably in a given lifetime.
this. I married a high IQ female. she turned out to be a total psycho bitch that destroyed my life.
good, then you can fuck her and have a bunch of genius inbred children.
That sounds very wholesome actually :)
Though you should probably remove porn pics like the one you posted and stop looking at other naked women that your wife imo.
IQ works only below 100. You won't tell difference between 120 and 140, it's not something that give you some secret smart boost out of nowhere, you need to educate yourself and work on improving. However you can always tell when someone is sub100, not amount of learned knowledge can change it.
>Why is it bad to take both the husband and the wife’s opinion in consideration... Women have opinions too you know.
The wife can always offer an opinon. They usually do. But any pretence at equality will lead to resentment at being overruled. In what relationship is resentment a useful or healthy state of affairs? She has to accept that her opinions might be heard, but the decision will belong to the husband exclusively.
>Some women are good leaders just like some men are good leaders. But in general most men and women aren’t good at leading.
No. History is an excellent catalogue of women failing to lead in any circumstance, barring the rarest and most fringe cases. Groups comprised of women/led by women do not become self-sustaining and stable, but instead collapse. This stems from the female imperative that any conflict is dealt with by exclusion and ostracism. This is not how men deal with conflict.
>That has literally nothing to do about the fact that a marriage should be a partnership
You are wrong. Sexual archetypes are extremely useful in gauging what women really want. And what women really want, what they dream about in the privacy of their own head, is not equality or leadership.
>There’s one of marriages were the wife is the smarter and more responsible one
Those women failed in finding a man whom they could look up to. Infidelity in such relationships is common.
>Also there’s tons of cruel men out there you know and also huge power imbalances tend to naturally lead to the person in power being cruel, I think that the Sanford prison experiment proved this.
Nobody can pretend to be something they are not for longer than a month. Women are shrewd judges of character. Keep your legs shut for cruel men if you don't like it. The surprising fidelity a battered wife has for her spouse indicates that controlling/abusive partners satisfy a primal attraction drive, albeit in an unhealthy fashion.
Is this true? I have wondered about people who I thought might have been intelligent but as I got to know them, I realize they are seriously lacking in common sense AND logic. They are just skilled in talking in a manner that, on the surface, SOUNDS intelligent. These types make it hard to figure out where they actually stand IQ-wise, but I tend to come to think of them as exceptionally dumb because I see past the surface manipulative bullshit.
Post tits or leave roastie.
>Stanford Prison Experiment proves a propensity for cruelty in men
No. Recent revelations about the manner in which experimenters interfered with the decisions of the participants indicate that the cruelty of the guards was anything but spontaneous, but suggested and encouraged by the team carrying out the study. This experiment, from start to finish, was a lie.
I don't want an equal that will look down on me. I want an inferior who I can tame and be good to
Jews and pseudo-intellectuals will never understand this, but IQ is a shit kike metric and big differences in intellect aren't significant in relationships, but differences in attitude are crucial, histrionic BPD retards will match well with other psychotic shits, people with some sort of self-control will feel less terrible around other proper adults...
> muh breeding
Yeah, redneck, it's all about "muh dick".
>No. History is an excellent catalogue of women failing to lead in any circumstance, barring the rarest and most fringe cases. Groups comprised of women/led by women do not become self-sustaining and stable, but instead collapse.
>This stems from the female imperative that any conflict is dealt with by exclusion and ostracism. This is not how men deal with conflict.
Fucking this
Lol 140 here. I can absolutely tell IQ over 100. 90-110 are normal decent folk. 111-130 are insufferable inflated know it all midwits. 131+ are usually coping more or less well with being so alone among the masses and I'm always excited to talk to them.
Suck a dick
Once you clear the threshold of like ~115 you're capable of doing pretty much all of the cognitively demanding work that you'd encounter in the workplace, truly galaxy brain 99th percentile IQ's are only necessary if your goal is to do like post-graduate hard science
This graph is wrong. Women have ~3 points lower IQ than Men, in addition to a narrower curve.
Pic related is what it actually looks like
SEETHING kek
>She has to accept that her opinions might be heard, but the decision will belong to the husband exclusively.
Why should the decision belong to the husband exclusively? Tons of men are bad at making decisions.
>No. History is an excellent catalogue of women failing to lead in any circumstance, barring the rarest and most fringe cases. Groups comprised of women/led by women do not become self-sustaining and stable, but instead collapse.
That’s not true.
>Sexual archetypes are extremely useful in gauging what women really want. And what women really want, what they dream about in the privacy of their own head, is not equality or leadership.
Shut up Freud. Just because you like to be treated a certain way during sex doesn’t mean you want to be treated that way outside of sex.
>Those women failed in finding a man whom they could look up to. Infidelity in such relationships is common
Just because a woman is the smarter and more responsible one doesn’t mean that the relationship will fail. Also there’s more dumb men than women so do you think that the dumb men shouldn’t marry then and that the smart men should have multiple wives or something??
>Nobody can pretend to be something they are not for longer than a month. Women are shrewd judges of character. Keep your legs shut for cruel men if you don't like it.
First off a lot of people become cruel over time and secondly a system were a woman isn’t allowed to make decisions will naturally make men more abusive I think.
>The surprising fidelity a battered wife has for her spouse indicates that controlling/abusive partners satisfy a primal attraction drive, albeit in an unhealthy fashion.
That’s probably because they literally fear for their lives if they cheat and also I don’t even know if it’s true that women with abusive and controlling partners cheat less.
Post abs.
Even if it’s false which I don’t think is true I still believe that power tend to corrupt.
Shut up.
Wtf numbers are these? At least write the test they're using
This. There's definitely a cutoff point that creates serious existential depression. I find that people afflicted often turn to depressant drugs to cope.
>tfw no qt3.14 genius gf to make uber-anons with
>Also there’s more dumb men than women so do you think that the dumb men shouldn’t marry then and that the smart men should have multiple wives or something??
Historically 80% of women had children but only 40% of men did. So half of men are fucking worthless and should not breed. You want to marry a homeless fuck just to be the smart one in the relationship. Darwin said there is more variation in the male then the female. Some of this variation is going to be smart people the other worthless dumbfucks. The reason for the variation is that a man with a positive variance gets a payoff by having multiple kids with multiple women. Where women can only have a kid once every nine months.
>Historically 80% of women had children but only 40% of men did. So half of men are fucking worthless and should not breed.
Do you think that it would be a good thing if only that few men got to marry and have kids?
>You want to marry a homeless fuck just to be the smart one in the relationship.
Obviously not... Do you want to marry a drug addict woman just to be the smart one in the relationship?
Women aren't meant to be intelligent, they're meant to be obedient.
Kindly fuck off.
Here's an accurate graph folks. Quit baiting the goddamn incels with your trashy bell curves.
>Why should the decision belong to the husband exclusively? Tons of men are bad at making decisions.
Because women resent a man who is so weak/incompetent, that she has to take charge. Women despite weak men.
>History is not true.
The lack of female leaders in history is real. The lack of female-only groups forming long-term and stable hierarchies is real.
>Shut up Freud. Just because you like to be treated a certain way during sex doesn’t mean you want to be treated that way outside of sex.
Mate selection lies at the root of a whole bunch of social behaviours. The fact remains that women do not daydream about leadership, or even have any interest in it. Books written by/targeted toward women do not feature these themes. Books written by women tend to focus exclusively on relationship dilemmas. None of the viable prospects are ever men whom they can boss around. Woman as boss does not exist in anything that women are drawn towards.
>Just because a woman is the smarter and more responsible one doesn’t mean that the relationship will fail. Also there’s more dumb men than women so do you think that the dumb men shouldn’t marry then and that the smart men should have multiple wives or something??
We know from genetic studies that a substantial fraction of men died without fathering children. Women clearly have a preference for men who rank higher in the social hierarchy than most. Monogamy went a long way to solving this problem because it forced the best men off the market early, leading to a race to capture the best available men in the shortest possible time. This is how women learned to settle for less.
>wanting to date high IQ women
Pro tip from a phd student: don't. They're annoying cunts who think because they have a bit more cognitive ability than the average person therefore they know everything. It's only worth it if they're autistic because autist gfs shut their mouth due to bad communication skills. Do yourself a favour and get a young simple gf who holds zero political beliefs and breed her to maximum capacity.