Won't you look at Yale's logo... Between this and S&B I'm suspecting a lot of esoterism/kabbalism.
How do Communists Actually Explain this??
Henry Butler
Connor Perez
>Jennings C. Wise, in Woodrow Wilson: Disciple of Revolution, makes the pertinent comment, "Historians must never forget that Woodrow Wilson, despite the efforts of the British police, made it possible for Leon Trotsky to
enter Russia with an American passport."
>Guaranty Trust Company, the largest trust company in the United States and controlled by the J.P. Morgan firm. Guaranty Trust used Olof Aschberg, the Bolshevik banker, as its intermediary in Russia before and after the revolution. Guaranty was a backer of Ludwig Martens and his Soviet Bureau, the first Soviet representatives in the United States.
>Martens is very much in the limelight. There appears to be no doubt about his connection with the Guarantee [sic] Trust Company, Though it is surprising that so large and influential an enterprise should have dealings with a Bolshevik concern. Scotland Yard Intelligence Report, London, 1919
No it's antony
en.wikipedia.org
Just because I'm not delivering all this info like an encyclopedia doesn't mean it doesn't exist or that the ideas are invalid. You're just knit picking and not attacking the actual arguments
Anthony Torres
>If trotsky was an MI6 plant, why didn't they allow him entry into the UK
>Associating with your plant in a foreign government
user, I highly recommend an IQ test
Easton Torres
>Just because I'm not delivering all this info like an encyclopedia doesn't mean it doesn't exist or that the ideas are invalid. You're just knit picking and not attacking the actual arguments
>knit picking
It's nit-picking user.
You should at least know how to spell it since you love to engage in it.
>
No it's antony.
The ideas are invalid because they are retarded.
Every source you quote is a conspiratard who raves about
>muh freemasons
or
>muh federal reserves
or
>muh zog
when in exile he was no longer in government, and it easily could have been justified on the ground of human rights.
IQ test yourself ya fucking bong
Wyatt Robinson
>Sure, then the FRG was conquered from Germany by the US, UK and France.
YES YOU FUCK!
kek
This is basic shit.
>If trotsky was an MI6 plant, why didn't they allow him entry into the UK after he was exiled from the USSR?
Probably figured Stalin would have an easier time getting to him there?
They shipped him to fucking Mexico for a reason dude.
>He tried to gain entry into UK.
Maybe he fucked up his contract dude
A million and one reasons could be why
or it could have just been a way to contact the brits and le thtem know he needed the fuck out of europe.
>Could've used him to destabilize the USSR--so why not? If he actually was a plant of theirs?
You're assumtion being that the UK WANTED to destroy the USSR.
When my contention would be that they just wanted to controll it.
(or rather the Rothschilds did)
Ayden Campbell
You have this strange conception of what a conspiracy is. Not everything takes place in a secret room with hoods on. Certain people have vested interests whether ethnic, economic, whatever.
Jacob Schiff believed that the Tsar oppressed Jews and wanted it toppled. He later regretted the rise of bolshevism. I doubt this was true, but that's the official record and doesn't matter to my point.
A jew (Schiff) among other jews funded one of the most terrible regimes that ever existed.
Ackerman, Kenneth (2016). Trotsky in New York, 1917: A Radical on the Eve of Revolution. Counterpoint. pp. 320–321
This regime was heavily Jewish.
All communist regimes have been heavily Jewish.
We point this out and you call us retards. You don't even recognize this fact. You have every right to say it doesn't matter, and we will disagree.
To my detriment, I try to have a fair discussion with communists on this board, but if you're just gonna name call there's no point talking to you.