>Chinese cannibalism of infant flesh outrages the world

Wasn't that infant eating only a some korean "artist's" larp from 2000?

>The rest of chinese history is all about race mixing with neighboring barbarians
>neighboring barbarians
>being Korean
That's very true, barbarian

That’s it. We need to glass these insects once and for all

you all must feel it buy now ,ww3 with the chinese is close?

proof

By what right can pro-choice advocates complain about people aborting and eating babies? They're just lumps of cells and not people, right? If the woman can kill the fetus why can't she sell it or eat it? It's her body right?

>Aborting innocent and healthy unborn children
Woah that happens by the thousands in the U.S. all the time.

The next phase. Waste not want not. If we use the 120 theory method which is if we decide to kill all clumps of cells over the next 120 years to see if life exist at the end of it. If life does exist then the clumps of cells were not life if life does not exist then it was life. This is the only way to test the theory to see if a clump of cells has meaning or life. This is based around the issue of choice which is only valuable when attached to life being a clump of cells. Hence justification for the killing of humans in the womb. Without the clump of cells degrading aspect or pretending it is not life choice does not stand in its merits. Because the mother has protection from possible death or harm when pregnant and has the right to kill the human in development however the same reciprocal protection mechanisms are not offered for the human in development when possible harm or death occurs with abortion. Equative equality is missing. The human in development should by equality have the right to be protected. This is basic feminism equality. The theory nullifies the use of an attachment to protect choice. Without it you are killing life based only in choice. That is nullified by equators like equative equality. This provides meaning and value of life. 50million abortions are done world wide yearly. 125 thousand a day. Most in developing countries.

Law is based around survival. Equative equality. However I fear that profit is a source for this and population control. Liberty it seems comes at a price. Death to human life based on the 120 theory. And a non reciprocal entity and law which is non equative equality. How many tax dollars are pumped into this institution? In doing this we share the burden of liberty and that Statue of Liberty represents death to life. Based off the 120 theory and ignoring the word choice which has little power when you kill human life development.

The hypocrisy of the left.