Yes I have empathy for mixed individuals primarily because it was never their choice to be so. However would you not agree that the division and suffering could in the long run be avoided if all outgroups were eliminated? If only one group controlled the entire world eventually yes, subsets would occur. However during this time of unity would not there be peace and huge, humanitarian goals of science and society be achieved? What is the purpose of keeping a plethora of nation states when you can just fill the entire world of one peoples, artificially or naturally? Lets pretend we can genetically modify all future children to be 150IQ. Now what? Would it not be in the 150IQ races interest to become the predominate identity on earth? How can we argue that we deserve to be here with the 150IQs when our subsets are an average of 105s and 110s?
Accelerationists in other countries outside of the United States are quite clueless on how quickly the world power...
>Russia & Putin giving away their long lost dream of an empire stretching from Gibralatar to Vladivostok
The Russian doesn't "give" things. Think of them as a more maniacal version of USA, did USA give things to Mexico? Fuck no. They took Texas and all lands they deem belonging to them.
Sorry 70% swedish 30% african, but you get my point.
>Well whether through artificial subversion and implementation or natural selection, or both, surely you could take the germans and the french and carefully propagandize/mix these two groups to create a stronger, more specific subset.
Yeah but it would destroy their groups characteristics, you're creating an entirely new group or strain by doing so. if you propagandize they all mix up. You're saying each group is bad for existing independent of the other. It's one thing if some of them go mix it's not that big of a problem as if you say everyone of them have to go mix. Cause then their groups are gone. If you only have a few that are mixed relative to the totality of say french. Those who are mixed can still have commonality with french cause they are mixed with french and something else. Like french german or whatever in your example. If you mix them with too many, they lose connection with the groups.. Don't feel they quite belong in either of them. That's a problem when they live in a country with more purebred french if you will. They'll be like, you do this in this way, i am with you that % of the way, but there's like something dragging me in the other direction. This creates obvious issues, if you have way too many of those. like if say that was 40% of french were like that. Would they understand the french mentality? Probably not..
Also you talk about creating some superior group of specimens through propagandized hybridization. Look people are not toys. The world is not your private laboratory.. And what is created from that can't just be undone by pressing undo button!
Have to respect the various ethnic groups on the planet, not play around with them and pretend their right to exist and preserve themselves is just some arbitrary thing.
You don't seem to respect that the various groups exist or even care that they exist as they do.
Mexico is not China. They can always duke it out later down the road, and since China is willing to make one hundred year plans and let the pot stew, one dictator after the next, surely China would be willing to compromise on what some thing would be theres to take and give? Nobody is saying that Russia and China would not eventually harbor enough aggression towards one another to fight amongst themselves. But when a superpower is falling what do the smaller powers do? They ally themselves and tear at the bigger. The Americans compromised with the Communists and allowed them to push into Berlin first, instead of the Americans who could have adequately beaten them there.
In what way are people not just datasets and collectives of beings? Again, merely creating devils advocate theory, but surely if you cannot press a button you may pull a trigger? Just like that someone is gone. Like you said, genocide can occur within six months! Why couldn't breeding be considered a toolset rather than a sacred act? If all those in control are purely materialists and not spiritually accepting then surely they can compartmentalize the notion that humans are just a type of animal, and that you are allowed to have domain over anyone who is willing?
>Lets pretend we can genetically modify all future children to be 150IQ. Now what? Would it not be in the 150IQ races interest to become the predominate identity on earth? How can we argue that we deserve to be here with the 150IQs when our subsets are an average of 105s and 110s?
What makes you think that the intelligence or competence of a group should determine if they should exist or not?
Do aboriginals not deserve to exist because they are not very intelligent? ofcourse they do.
Maybe we should declare that some animals are stupid and wipe them out cause they look stupid or something.
It's a very weird mindset you have about this. And i can't say i like it very much.
Nobody not any group on the planet should jump through any hoops to justify why they should exist as a group. Nor should they be wiped out for being stupid. Nor has that even occurred either.
They should simply live in a society that fits with how they are as a people. Intelligence isn't everything. Maybe they can have a society that is more low tech, but they are happy doing their thing their way. Then another group might handle scientific innovation cause they're good at that, and share that with that group as those things develope.
Coexistence.. Respect for living things, and a preservation of all ethnic groups. You just need to understand that not all groups are geared for living in for example a european society with all the skyhigh requirements of competence and discipline and a particular behaviour. That some are just like.. man i don't want to live like that. I want to fucking run around buttnaked in africa. THAT'S OK.. that's what you should be doing.. you got food to eat, you got all these things.. you'll get what you need.. setup farming and stuff like this.. basic things you must be taught so you can provide for yourself. But then be your nation and people and do your thing..
This universalism insisting that different ethnic groups should behave in the similar way, ignoring that they are different and aren't wired for that don't want that. By cramming them into the same nation as people who want things in a way that they just absolutely despise. That's just a TERRIBLE way of doing it.
Rather meaningful segregation of the groups. Guaranteed preservation of each, so nobody is fighting to fuck eachother over cause they're scared of their group being destroyed or whatever. is much better.
Needs to ofcourse not overpopulate their territory all should be balanced so they have enough for each person. But then they can run around buttnaked in africa for example if they want to. What problem should that be? As long as they have what they need and can provide somewhat for themselves. Why do they need to be super high tech and all these things if they don't want to. Maybe they just don't like it.. Have other groups be like that if some don't.
Congratulations. Not only did you explain why eugenics is a flawed concept, but you also explained why the alt-right misunderstands why it wants eugenics in the first place because of anecdotal "tyrone wants to run buttnaked in africa so his entire race does"
Mate, I know these things. Chinese and Russian partnerships are an absolute joke to this date and give a huge advantage to China.
This is only because Russia needs some form of ally in the case of USA deciding to invade with their NATO allies. If USA is gone, you can kiss that alliance between the two powers goodbye.
And modern Chinese are truly not a people of patience, did you know that there is a huge immigration of Chinese to Siberia? Most people don't talk about this, hell even demographers don't dare to disclose their exact numbers nowadays. China wants to take Siberia and a Russia without Siberian resources is nothing.
>Some Russians perceive hostile intent in the Chinese practise of using different names for local cities, such as Hǎishēnwǎi for Vladivostok, and a widespread folk belief states that the Chinese migrants remember the exact locations of their ancestors' ginseng patches, and seek to reclaim them.
This is from a fucking wikipedia and they just outright rename cities as they see fit and think their ancestors lived there.
I repeat, if you think Russia and China are allies and that Russia will give in at critical moments, then you're wrong