How would Yas Forums fix ‘Democracy’ without dismantling it?

Attached: D5B0C6CF-5717-446C-A4BC-4E6D0C27E56E.jpg (360x531, 36.04K)

Other urls found in this thread:

m.youtube.com/watch?v=FjltY8ditmg
youtube.com/watch?v=J7_he6pYxPI
archive.org/details/100QuestionsAboutFascism
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

democracy naturally leads into the situation we have now, so do most ideologies. the good times > weak men cycle is not to be broken

We live in a constitutial republic--not a democracy. The best way to fix the democratic aspect of the constitutional republic would be to increase the voting age to 25. The human brain isn't done growing until then--literal retards shouldn't be allowed to vote.

>mosley never succeeded
one of the greatest tragedies

Attached: leclerc.jpg (625x931, 85.54K)

I think there needs to be some kind of vetting procedure for politicians to see if they are acceptable. In order to run in an election you have to be approved by a council of wise men. Of course the problem would be how do you pick the council members?

Stricter rules about eligibility to vote.

What do you think about household vote, instead of individual votes.

Ban Parliamentary democracy

Democracy is letting 51% of the population vote you into a gulag.

Democracy is the issue fren.

Amen.

m.youtube.com/watch?v=FjltY8ditmg

Attached: 47C9D850-035C-4902-B5DF-8750418B6BA0.jpg (474x248, 27.04K)

>Stricter rules about eligibility to vote.

Like the one presented in Starship Troopers?

I would dismantle it desu but if I had to stick with it then it would be done the following way

>People can vote like they do now
>Ministers and leaders can only be people who have more than 3 children and done at least 4 years of military service as an officer
>Lobbyism in all its forms will be removed
>State funded media and actual free press will both exist
>Removal of foreign influence in politics

Only white males 25+ who are net taxpayers can vote.

severely curtail judicial oversight aka 'the rule of law'

Democracy is inherently broken and I reject it on principle.

There is no saving democracy. Unless you have very stringent requirements on voting rights and political power but then it isn't really democracy

"Rivers of Blood" - the prophetic speech by (Sir) Enoch Powell youtube.com/watch?v=J7_he6pYxPI

Attached: 150481_01_lg_0_0_0.jpg (64x64, 1.19K)

Women are not allowed to vote
Immigrants are not allowed to vote

>Only males 25+ who are net taxpayers
Sounds better and has the same result

The British system, before the European disaster and the sickness caught from the rotting Soviets, was on a path to perfection.

A great nation with a history of founding new great nations is fit to fill the stars. We need only cut out the cancer without killing the patient and begin chemotherapy.

With effort we will recover and find our path once more.

Blessed post.
Could you link me a file dump for Mosley's books please? PDF or Epub I don't care but the man's idea seems very interesting.
>t. frenchman who's currently reading Doctrine of Fascism, Siege and Anti-Tech Revolution.

Problem with that is is people who are better off and more successful buying a bunch of houses and not letting others buy them

Limited franchise. Popular veto. Term limits. Ban (((meddling))).

"Democracy" just means whatever jews like. Whenever they force my country into another war, it's always in the name of "spreading democracy" or "human rights" or some other gay shit that coincidentally benefits Israel.

Attached: 1397084571706.jpg (1200x790, 320.46K)

By limiting the powers of the elected government to a bare minimum. Also by making it so that the house of commons sits only a couple of times in a year. Full time legislation was one of the biggest mistakes that was ever made.

>Fix
>Without dismantling
Why would you not want to dismantle democracy?

Attached: 1581279656388.jpg (1238x797, 91.91K)

Not exactly, but military service would be one avenue to voting rights.

Well that's true. Landlords are, without exception, fucking retards

By making sure that you only get a vote if you're being held responsible for your vote, be it financially by being a net tax payer or politically by having military training so that if your representative declares war it's you who gets drafted.

>or
Sorry; and

>increase the voting age to somewhere between 21-25. And I say this as a 19 year old.
>have requirments to vote. This is tricky cause I don't want laws set up to try to prevent certain people from voting. I just want the people who vote to be intelligent and good people.
>probably require age like I said 21-25.
> have to be in education, work, or military to be eligible to vote.
>series of government, economic, and historical classes required to be taken by everyone before reaching 18.
Also in general I would suggest
>at least three years military service required upon turning 18(unless there's some obvious reason the person can't)
>some sort of youth program to teach kids useful life skills and self discipline. I know this sounds like hitler youth but think more boyscouts with less gayness and ran by the government.
Have a lot more public debate and speeches. Also disband the two party system.

pure democracy seems to only work for those who have higher intelligence and who have higher % of genetics coming from Hunter Gatherer groups. Hunter Gatherers generally have lower intelligence but function in smaller tribes closer to approaching pure democracy: you have tribal leader(s) but you also require group consensus to function and every important person in the tribe has some sort of say in what the tribe is going to do. It also requires everyone to be genetically closer to each other so that they consider themselves part of the same ingroup

Any form of government requires genetic compatibility to that form of it's ppl in order to function properly (ie: people from the Near East tend to not do well with various forms of democracy, pure or otherwise; ex-Slaves from America in Liberia could not make a Republic work even though their constitution was an exact copy of USA's, etc.) So for Pure Democracy you'd need a people genetic disposition to being OK with forming societies based on group consensus who also tend toward higher intelligence and genetic uniformity. Good candidates for that seems to be extremely Northern Europeans (Scandinavians with Icelandics probably being the best) and most likely the Japanese.

Empire building requires authoritarianism not only b/c you are conquering outsiders and bringing them into your empire but also b/c it is encourages miscegenation of the people within the empire and is banding together highly disparate groups as that empire increases itself. The more disparate, the more authoritarianism is needed.

Other forms of democratic governments that aren't pure still require genetic compatibility in order to function. Any group that considers itself outsiders from the main body must either be purged or allowed to go their separate ways. This is why Jews and various other forms of non-Whites do not tend to function well as good actors in White Democratic countries: they tend toward low trust.

>have requirements to vote
be a white male who owns property or has made/is making investments and own guns seems like a good way to start.

I'm still not redpilled enough to ban people from voting based on race or gender sorry friend. Not to mention of we make requirments I think it's likely a lot of people will just give up voting to be honest. I can't see a lot of the females I know being willing to go through too much effort.

We should've never given rights to women.
It is via women that the Jew has been able to poison our well.
Women are influencable, on a scale of which you're not prepared to see. The subversion that you see in action right now is because we allowed a weak point to exist in our society, that is, giving women the right to matter in it.

you could always go with IQ tests -which is what the South basically did post-Civil War. Ofc, it being ruled unconstitutional was a cause celebre for the newly arrived Jewish immigrants post-WWII b/c they didn't like the idea of whites behaving in tribal way. White Identity politics reduced the power of their own Jewish Identity Politics.

IQ tests are to be taken with a grain of salt. It does not mesure "intelligence", rather it mesures your capacity of logical reasoning; you could argue that it is useful for vooting, but democracy has failed its people, as such I call for Fascism.

This guy brings up a good point. Not to mention in general you have to be careful with restrictions cause people will take advantage of them. But even if we did go with IQ tests. How would you want to do it? Would you want everyone with an average IQ to vote? Only those with a higher then average IQ? What would be your approach?

>Reform it into a technocracy
>Enact strict term limits for all in office
>Disallow people with questionable foreign connections from running
>Disallow immigrants from voting
>Ban corporate backing

I would 'fix' it by replacing it with Monarchy, the most natural and divine form of governance.

Uh huh. And how do you think the monarchs should be chosen? Do you really think bloodline is a good justification for rule?

>I would 'fix' it by replacing it with Monarchy, the most natural and divine form of governance.

I agree, but 26 would be better.

Attached: 701DAB51-ECDD-4469-B9AA-6D80CEA54266.png (242x241, 5.5K)

Also a good idea. Maybe two years of work in any government job so that one understands how it works and to give them skin in the game.

I think the two requirements should be at least 26 and two years of government service.

Democracy only works with people of the same ethnic background.

You can't fix democracy.

archive.org/details/100QuestionsAboutFascism

>Democracy

Attached: democracy.jpg (2040x1528, 675.66K)

Outside influence (PACs, lobbying, etc) must be greatly reduced, if not eliminated outright. Corporations and special interests have utterly corrupted democracy to their benefit and the expense of the common man.

what kind of silly question is that?

all you need to do is punish corruption/‘lobbying’

>Only white male landowners can vote
Ezpz

/thread

Get rid of all the people that dont belong in your country

bingo, and only men who contribute more in taxes than they take

Attached: 1496086515432.png (421x460, 251.88K)

I don't believe in hereditary rule, but it is entirely possible that a Kings son could inevitably gain rule. No, a King would be selected through accomplishment or deed - be it military action, industrial, religious, or otherwise. A King is meant to be Gods avatar, and would need to command reverence, respect, and authority. Kings who fail to live up expectations or lose God's favor are to be removed through whatever means deemed necessary.

Women and non whites shouldnt be able to vote.

Yes

thinking that its possible to fix democracy without dismantling it made me laugh kek