Isn’t hypergamy a good thing because it enables successful men to have the most fertile women for reproduction?

Isn’t hypergamy a good thing because it enables successful men to have the most fertile women for reproduction?

Attached: ED1FDB66-255F-4D16-B9D7-1AE45DF9E670.jpg (828x979, 100.96K)

Evolution is eugenics you fucking RACIST

Think about poor Dr Shekelstein next time, and stick your dick in a mixed race diabeetus instead

They're not partnering with the 'most successful'. They're choosing partners based on who is the best looking. That person could be a garbage man for all they care, provided he's an 8+.

also money because women are cheap whores

If that were true then fertility rates wouldn't be in decline.

yeah cause hypergamy has to do with monetary stuff

>successful
sucess is relative
we don't smash people's skulls on caves anymore

Yeah, money too, but that's always been a thing. This "I only bang 8+ guys even though I'm a 4" thing that's now widespread is relatively new, and begun and evolved to what it is today with the advent of online dating.

holographic principle: you really can read a book by its cover.

Hypergamy isn't a real thing. Incels like to say "humans have an alpha-beta caste system like nature" but in reality, if you look at nature...
1. There are many animals that mate for life. Some of them (eg. penguins) never mate again if their mate dies.
2. Even in animals that have alpha-dominated harems, it isn't the women who seek out the alpha, but are rather forced to by rape and violence; while beta males are driven away from the alpha's territory by violence, because whenever there is a beta around, females will frequently split away from the alpha's harem to pursue the beta male.

user i am sorry but women are actually really good at selecting the best men genetically it is literally theyre only skill. beta men are great for technology and academia and civilization but at the end of the day the 6 ft 4 250 extrovert is apex human genetically

>t. classically darwinian loser

The men women are attracted to are not necessarily the men that are successful within our current day society or possess the traits that are necessary to be successful, so it may have a dysgenic effect.

>the 1/10 man wouldn’t partner with the 10/10 woman
Awful graphic

Successful is subjective. Would you say someone that makes millions a year but is greying much earlier than he should and looks 20 years older than he should as successful?

Besides, that form of breeding you are suggesting is ok in small separated groups/clans. However, breeding like this spells death to a civilization and is a form of regression to a much more primitive society. In other words it destroys the civilization your ancestors worked hard to build and keep together.

Attached: checklist.jpg (480x360, 31.4K)

In reality, Incels are just coping with their own failures by overexaggerating the difficulty of dating because they chase model women while being ugly, out of shape jobless, skilless, shut-in neets, who are creepy and women-hating besides. If they weren't half of these things, they would easily find at least ugly women falling in their laps once in a while.

Attached: 1582682391184.jpg (1000x563, 268.4K)

Men unable to find partners create violence and keep societies in the iron age. Monogamy permits civilization.

Yes, but only if you don't care about the building and maintenance of society, which requires buy-in from those low status males.

Attached: 1575422821390.jpg (505x550, 33.49K)

being in that top section, it's pretty baller desu.

10/10 female does not equal fertility, and actually the have less children due to hookup culture

It actually enables this and women who should not reproduce to have massive options.

until the rest of the men gang up and murder them all

Attached: 1572748143537.jpg (750x803, 104.93K)

>user i am sorry but women are actually really good at selecting the best men genetically it is literally theyre only skill. beta men are great for technology and academia and civilization but at the end of the day the 6 ft 4 250 extrovert is apex human genetically
Women tend to want to import third worlders and have sex with them. I think you might want to rethink everything you fucking wrote idiot.

Can you losers please fuck off and die somewhere?

Seriously, dont you get tired of being so constantly hateful and bitter towards women?

Every day, multiple times per day, incels feel this incessant need to post negative things towards women.

Did you ever stop to think that maybe, just maybe, if you started treating women as, jeez I dont know, HUMANS, you might actually find a woman who would give you the time of day?

Pic related, my face when you losers rage over women for the umpteenth time in a row.

Attached: 20190621_022823.jpg (862x1212, 465.68K)

Beyond Women.
Hypergamy is hatred for all of humanity.
As you have already stated, the worst-off party has to agree to the terms of the system or else school shooting.

cope

>Seriously, dont you get tired of being so constantly hateful and bitter towards women?

Attached: 1583389644110.png (329x407, 167.23K)

Feminism and it's consequences have been a disaster for western nations.

Sociopathy is a sexy trait.

Feminism is a shit test the West has collectively failed.

>Isn’t hypergamy a good thing because it enables successful men to have the most fertile women for reproduction?

no. because the rest of the men either stop supporting the society or become active rebels against it, preventing cooperation within the society and allowing them to be easily conquered from the outside. men don't sacrifice themselves so their competitor can get laid.

at least use a realistic picture of yourself

Attached: cat lady.jpg (634x429, 82.94K)

I'm sorry Germany

>most fertile women
Why should 1-5 tier females be allowed to spread their inferior, garbage genes and pollute the gene pool if 1-5 tier men arent? Yes, thats how reality works, but what is your response and moral justification for the phenomenon, op?
1. In the modern west, humans dont mate for life.
2. Unlike the world of animals, the modern west ferociously prohibits acts of rape and sexual violence.

Attached: 5gd7uz71oqf11.jpg (1400x1540, 417.9K)

honestly what is the worst that could happen if we had controlled sexuality, that is to say, all people became men and then went to breeding factories whenever horny and then the offspring would either be another person or another breeder?

>maybe if you treated women nice they'd want to fuck you
>ew, men are not entitled to women's bodies just for being "nice" to them

Cognitive dissonance is the feeling of holding two mutually exclusive beliefs simultaneously as true.

If too many men feel disenfranchized and too many women end up line mother's you've got yourself a recipe for disaster

Your problem is you don't know when to be nice and when to be an asshole. There's a time and place for both, and it's part of the language that is "speaking to the opposite sex".

Not without Constant war to trim away the InCell fat.

Really when you think about it it’s men who perpetuate this inequality by fucking women who are beneath them instead of sticking to girls worthy of them. The reason for this? Men have become sadists for whom the ability to humiliate and degrade and bully women sexually is a precondition of their own arousal

(((successful))) men have successfully fucked the gene pool, as a society we reward the wrong traits

>women select men based on their natural preferences
>muh not real natural selection

Attached: kosmos.jpg (717x957, 553.46K)

The rule is always be an asshole if you can get away with it.

Being agreeable is a low status ploy.

I believe I heard somewhere that the dutch stopped short men from breeding. That why their country is so tall.

This is also absolutely true. I worked as a fucking janitor making barely above minimum wage for many years, but because i have a handsome face and i'm tall, females would not just acknowledge my presence, but even hit on me regularly. In the pursuit of attention from vaginas, being financially successful helps substantially, but physical first impressions are everything.

Not if you enjoy internet, running electricity, and the good things that come with technology and modern society. Civilization is, at the basics, an agreement between alphas and betas: the former agree to share pussy so that the latter won’t band together, kill him and steal his pussy; with everyone alive and enjoying pussy, men can work together to build stuff and run a working society.

yes but that is eugenics, and the problem with eugenics is that eventually, there will be a genetic trait that you possess that will need to be erased, and so would you want eugenics if you had to be first?

Attached: sniffers.gif (315x209, 1.45M)

Hypergamy is well documented.
Points 1 and 2, however are correct.

Or. Or.

Hear me out.

Male sexual strategy is based on access to females where high status men can fuck with zero emotional or financial investment but low status men must be willing to invest heavily due to a lack of genetic preference which requires parental surity.

That's not how it works for men. They would prefer to date younger women in their early twenties.

It is, The thing that's causing it to fall apart was the destruction of monogamous marriage

because of the dissolution of monogamous relations being sealed with marriage the best men aren't removed from the dating market and continue to attract the other women, which causes displacement of all other men in the dating market system.

We need enforced marriage back.

isn't the mere existence of alphas and betas alone cuckoldry? humanity cucking itself?

By this you mean we need to take women's rights away.

You cannot make every man physically attractive to every woman.

You can, however, make every man socioeconomically attractive by barring women from university and the workplace.

There is an element of inequality in any system. The difference is the level. Once passed a certain point the political landscape starts to become unstable.

Right now, if male sexuality was measured with the Gini coefficient, it would be the 8th most unequal on Earth tying with Apartheid-era South Africa.

Assumes women are picking and reproducing with successful men.

They’re clearly doing a great fuck job, user.

No, it’s just how genetic variety works within a single species: some individuals are simply more desirables by the opposite sex. Chad will always have an easier time getting poon than your average Joe, let alone some internet wizard. Betas counterbalance this by having strength in numbers, they far outnumber the alphas, and though Chad could win a one on one fight, he can’t really do shit against a group of five, especially if they’re armed. In the dawn of time, Chad-agg had a harem, until Vir-gugg and his fellow regulars banded together, got ahold of their clubs, and beat him to a muddy pulp of blood and gore. Then they took Chad-agg’s wives for themselves.

We’re just working it out brosister

Chill out and have a beer, broski

Attached: DB926104-CD82-4D78-9D86-1624D9C89754.jpg (866x1300, 77.1K)

Why not just make sex bots? Once the artificial womb comes, its game over right?

Are you even human if you don't fucking hate women?

no why would I. There’s no reason to hate them because they are another gender

Women hate women more than any man could ever.

Imagine the same sexual competition a man has with other men, but their presence has no benefit of multitasking or spreading the workload.

LMAO we don't enpregnate those thots user they are just bump and dump cattle that ends alone and broken after the wall