That's why you don't dip your dick in crazy.
But the argument was about which is worse not what they can do. The woman carrying the baby would still have to mind it for 18 years. Where as the man just has to hand over a percentage of his wage.
Sex is actually riskier for the guy...
Caleb Bell
Caleb Bailey
Yes it was. Sex is riskier for a man.
>whether a man wants a child or not, he'll be on the hook for 18 years.
>if a woman doesn't want the child, she can kill it within the first 9 months, she can abandon it at any point in the following 18 years, she assumes less risk
>if a woman wants the child, what is she risking?
Adrian Diaz
The ever popular "got him on baby" move
Used since first semi conscious man stuck penis into woman who realised she will be taken care of because of his child.
Bentley Butler
Yes.
Carter Russell
No she wouldn't. She assumes no responsibility for the child, and can kill it or abandon it at any point in time. Men do not have this option.
Hunter Russell
Who cares. Faggotniggers that engage in pump and dump deserve no sympathy. If you have unprotected sex, well sex outside marriage for that matter, you deserve to suffer, probably more than 18 years.
Eli Thompson
>what is daycare or payed nannies
Women today dont even have to breast feed at all.
Women get their wage plus half of mens while deciding on how much they will spend on child, usualy minimum.
Now tell me whos better off in long run ?
Justin Reyes
This. Not to mention if the father wants his own family, his ability to provide for them is hindered, while the woman's is not.
Robert Bailey
You can if you dont mind swat team arresting you and serving your time.
Also whole society frowning upon your decision.
Oliver Moore
/thread
All other posts ITT are retarded