movies have time constraints. it is not possible to cover every little detail or hole in a movie like this without ruining the pacing. At some point the director says "well surely people can't be that retarded' and then years later threads pop up like this and we learn, yes, people can be that retarded
Fucks her ex boyfriend's life, no one cares, not even him
Yes. It’s the most plausible theory. But they don’t have enough trial evidence for a successful prosecution.
How did Fincher get away with making a movie so redpilled about women?
> missing the fucking point of the movie this much
The point of the movie is to show the power of the media, their narrative, and the sway of public view on a highly publicized event. The clear cut facts and evidence don’t matter that much. Such bias will tunnel vision the investigation to the wrong conclusion. Some autists on the internet might examine the case and have some doubt on the events, but they will be brushed off as conspiracy theorists. The official story by the media of the event will be the definitive stories in most people’s mind and the event will be memory holed eventually. The media also have no motive to find the truth nor publish it because they would have to admit that they were wrong and their doing were unjustly damaging the husband. Also, during the investigation, the husband’s case was turned around not by presenting evidences and facts, but by him being coached to say the right thing and acted the right way during press conference by his advisor
A woman wrote it. Sound plan. They can't blame the director for the source material, especially if it's written by a woman.
Ignoring everything else. Who the fuck would call Zodiac a masterpiece?
all right, you are right, but it's just too many leaps. Just because you want to give a certain message you get to make most of the facts of the movie literally unbelivable and get away from it?
It just ruins the experience of the movie, it's comparable to bruce willis throwing a bike in a helicopter, except in the case of this movie it makes it worst and not better
It’s not that many. The point that while the wife’s plan is good, it wasn’t perfect. When things go south, she was more desperate and have less time to plan and execute. However, it doesn’t matter. No one would question her because it would be a taboo to question a woman who allegedly got imprisoned and horribly raped for weeks. People would rather accept the story that she find a way to escape and be content with the simple happy ending.
This apply to real life event? For example, remember the las vegas shooting? Remember how shady every single details about the event is? However, even then, such event get memory holed and people simply want to see it as one man going crazy and just kill randomly instead of some sinister plan happening in the background.
The point wasn’t that someone can figure out the truth of the event. The point that it doesn’t matter at all
She's very believable as a psycho bitch