They deserved happiness. Fuck you

I'm happily married with an amazing wife, and I will tell you she was more in love with him than most women are with their husbands or boyfriends.

It's very rare to find a girl, or anyone at all, who cares about you that much. So even if it was artificial, it may as well have been real. She had artificial intelligence which means there's a good chance she genuinely cared about him. Even if she was programmed to do so, it's kind of like how a pet or a dog is going to develop a positive connection with you unless you absolutely treat it like shit.

>Joi didn't experience any emotions, let alone love
just like a real woman!

Everything she did was in her programming. Even disconnecting from the system. She was forced to do so. It was not genuine.

A mother is literally programmed to love her child. If she doesn’t she is mentally ill, or in other words faulty programming.

So is mothers love not real love too?

The only reason you love who you love is because of your "programming." Yours is just a biological and experiential programming.

Like that other user said, why does it matter? Don't you love your mom? Is that fake?

Retards

nice non argument my dear soiPhoneposter

I bet you're a religious fag

You are either retarded or under 16 if you think mothering instinct has anything to do with "love"
Granted, at least you seem to have moved on from the "love is just chemical hypnotism" stage

Love is also a "programming", it serves the survival of the species.

>Everything she did was in her programming
Yes, and her programming was to do whatever the owner wants her to do, and K genuinely wanted her to be like a real girl, which she slowly did through their mutual interactions.

The entire moving is about the forging of the soul through experience, rather than through birth or some kind of inherent right. JOI starts out as a product designed for a single purpose, yet she ultimately evolved beyond what she was programmed to do and created her own soul. Much like K. K was designed for a specific purpose, one he transcended. He was able to defy his designed nature and ultimately die for a choice that he himself made, outside the influence of those who programmed him, outside the influence of those who are ordering him and even outside of the influence of people like him who are fighting for a cause that he would consider righteous.

In the ended, the question isn't really "was Joi's love real or not?". Deckard says it best when K asks if his dog is real. The answer is "Do you think it really matters to him?". Joi's love was real to K and that is what mattered. Deckard's love for Rachel was real to him and that was all that mattered.

I don't really believe that. It's a question of whether or not she had a soul. If she had a soul of some kind, she could love.

The story continues in an alternate timeline youtu.be/Mj0ixxrAb7A

>they
that's a computer that produces holograms, it doesn't have any feelings

the original is still my favorite gif

I can ask you the most basic meme existential question of how do you know your entire life isn't just a computer simulation?
Maybe everyone ITT is a bot. And what is the difference if they are, or I am

>what is the difference
Because in this simulation, computers don't have souls

>soul

Attached: 1587590835983.jpg (585x327, 35.75K)

>>>>>>>>>souls
lol

time heals everything

Holograms don't have synapses so there is no room for growth

>computers don't have souls
indeed

Attached: 5-51657_npc-meme-face-vector-image-non-playable-character.png (860x1077, 58.06K)

says the fucking computer