I hated that BvS fight because I've seen TDKR. Batman did a whole lot of prep in TDKR than in BvS where he appears to be just stronger than supe because he has a kryptonite spear and ironman suit. They could've just used the TDKR fight and added some things. Because even with a kryptonite spear there's no way batman is fast enough to hit supe with it.
Given the similar premises, how and why did one of these two films succeed where the other failed spectacularly?
Matthew James
Evan Ward
Neither was good
Not even by capeshit standards
Christopher Parker
Frank Miller's right wing. Not Snyder who's like libertarian.
Logan Lewis
Bvs is an achievement in cinema. The other a shitty movie that was a success of marketing and monopoly
William Clark
/thread
Zemo wasn’t even a character , just a way to move a plot forward
The stairway fight was nice though and the friendship with Bucky and Steve worked but barely in the film
>bad guy frames Bucky
>an already wanted international criminal
Bravo
Also the entire thing was grey and boring.
Brandon Cook
Bvs is excellent, if at least visually (story excellent as well, great writing and pacing)
Oliver Bennett
Superman was great in mos and bvs
Ian James
One had setup and more than one person who is actually capable of acting, the other is DC shit.
Noah Taylor
Look at how retarded Batman looks holding that gun. Christ. Under no circumstances should a character named "Wonder Woman" look both cooler and more threatening than Batman in a scene.
Luke Howard
>I'd say the film is technically solid
>technically
Fuck no. It's probably one of the ugliest looking blockbuster films ever made.