How did LEGO manage to work with licensed properties from every competing media conglomerate simultaneously? It’s unprecedented.
Typically you’d think they would sign an exclusivity deal with warner or Disney to work with only their properties
How did LEGO manage to work with licensed properties from every competing media conglomerate simultaneously...
Michael Thomas
Cameron Gray
Because lego is the largest toy manufacturer in the world and they want those license sets marked up 10 dollars to make them money.
Owen Stewart
The licensed sets are what pulled lego from certain bankruptcy and keeps them afloat. It's their lifeblood.
Julian Carter
What this guy said.
Nathaniel Campbell
No, it was Bionicle
Wyatt Carter
Matthew Nguyen
unlicensed lego sets are peak comfy
Kevin Young
It was Star Wars, and Bionicle was a nice surprise.
Brayden Bailey
And this is why lego is so soulless now, they shifted from original ideas to entirely licensed shit. Boy am I glad the star wars constraction shit failed.
Cameron Sullivan
because lego is kino
Carson Hughes
blame weird shit the started making in early 2000 - this garbage nearly killed LEGO. Oversized parts, simplified and junorized. 80 or 90s car was made of around 30 pieces, this one 7. Thats why they went with licences and started to attract adult collectors
Jackson Jones
So basically they have the leverage to tell disney to play nice with Warner or they can kiss that sweet LEGO toy and media cash goodbye
Ian Wright
Now look at car from 80s. Everything is functional, car has roof and lights are made of pieces.
Kayden Collins
>6327
>6643
almost fooled me
Jason Jenkins
left or right
which one do u prefer?
David Fisher
right
Noah Young
>6643: Year Released: 1988
>6327: Year Released: 1998
nta but I hope you don't think Lego just adds 1 to the previous set number each time they make a new set.
Christian Richardson
boomer here, will always prefer the right version of the logo, it's simply more kino
Tyler Lopez
Logan Myers
Right version is shit. Left, classic one, with thin yellow outaline, is better.
Kevin Myers
it pains me to pick the right one since I'm practically pseudo-antifa
they do not?
Ian Williams
haha imagine getting home from work and finding your wife being held down by 3 other women and screaming in pleasure about the huge dildo they are fucking her with
Connor Robinson
Mandela Effect. I could swear they were called Legos growing up.
Julian Foster
right
both have a yellow outline bro
Carson Smith
>1998
>lego was already in the shitter for years at this point
>leaving out the rest of the set to be dishonest
I would still take sets from between 1992 and 1998 over licensed shit any day of the week. Also in new sets unless you are paying 200 dollars it's impossible to find a real brick built wall that isn't just an obscenely thin oversized piece of plastic that makes up the whole wall. just like castle sets in 1990s. some things don't change.
Nathan Jackson
Don't care didn't ask about your life. Right or left?
Nathan Nelson
Why not both?
Camden Morgan
6643 was made before 6327 dumbass, it's obvious by the graphic style.
Bentley Adams
But one has thin outaline, other one bold outaline.
Sebastian Torres
>>leaving out the rest of the set to be dishonest
The rest is equally shit. Bike made of one big mold, trailer out of few plates and two bricks as a podium.
Noah Phillips
>they do not?
No. Sets within the same wave will have consecutive numbers, but their internal organizing system is more complex than just increasing the most recently produced set's number by one.
Thomas Wilson
Being a privately held foreign company probably helps a lot.
Matthew Bailey
>Being a privately held foreign company probably helps a lot.
Elaborate on this.