Why the FUCK was it so anticlimactic? The entire movie felt like a build up...to nothing

I saw it 3 times at the theater.

It was about a time that happened once in hollywood

The hell do you think you’re doing bringing that noisy hunk of shit around here at midnight?

Attached: EH2bMnFWsAAmdCg.jpg (1200x790, 127.7K)

>Tarantino re-wrote the Manson murders so they didn't happen and made him irrelevant in that time period.
What a RETARDED answer. So what was the whole point of the movie if it wasn't for the ranch scene and the attempted murder scene? If it's going to revolve the attempt of murdering Sharon Tate, at least have Manson on air a little more. Pointless.
Why would you watch ANY movie more than once at a theater?

the ending was the only good part of the movie. The rest was fucking pointless and boring

overrated average movie

Nah everything was good except the end

Attached: 1586905696024.png (909x900, 466.78K)

The core of the movie are their declining careers and their friendship. Living next door to Polanski/Tate and stopping the first Manson Murders are pivotal points for changes to their lives.

>movie
>has subplots

Attached: 1546035805284.png (658x543, 605.65K)

How are the beans?