Why the FUCK was it so anticlimactic? The entire movie felt like a build up...to nothing.
Why the FUCK was it so anticlimactic? The entire movie felt like a build up...to nothing
>Bradd Pittu BTFO a bunch of teenage cultists
>Anti-climactic
OP is a faggot
Thats the problem. It was easy peasy shit.
Personally, I think the movie is just a fun ride to go on.
Did she really deserve such a horrifying death?
It really was a letdown especially considering the lineup they had. Manson being in it for 10 seconds for starters. People will defend this movie but I wouldn't rewatch it.
>Manson being in it for 10 seconds for starters.
That was the point you retard. Tarantino re-wrote the Manson murders so they didn't happen and made him irrelevant in that time period.
Felt like Quentin wanted to make 2-3 movies and just said fuck it and combined em all.
>50's ex-Cowboy star and his descent into mediocrity
>Cool Stuntman on adventures around hollywood
>Manson Family focusing on all of Charlie's sluts
Who is the protagonist? What is their motivation?
Without either of these things it's just dude 60s lmao. Even kill bill was about... Killing bill.
>Keeps a fully gassed up flamethrower in his shed
Why did the 3rd act get so gory yet almost comical?
I saw it 3 times at the theater.
It was about a time that happened once in hollywood
The hell do you think you’re doing bringing that noisy hunk of shit around here at midnight?
>Tarantino re-wrote the Manson murders so they didn't happen and made him irrelevant in that time period.
What a RETARDED answer. So what was the whole point of the movie if it wasn't for the ranch scene and the attempted murder scene? If it's going to revolve the attempt of murdering Sharon Tate, at least have Manson on air a little more. Pointless.
Why would you watch ANY movie more than once at a theater?
the ending was the only good part of the movie. The rest was fucking pointless and boring
overrated average movie
Nah everything was good except the end
The core of the movie are their declining careers and their friendship. Living next door to Polanski/Tate and stopping the first Manson Murders are pivotal points for changes to their lives.
>movie
>has subplots
How are the beans?
HEY!
>You don't get these lines right, I'm gonna blow your fucking brains out tonight!
would you have preffered antman? normie
The issue is that this is a postmodern film you are attempting to force a classical schema on top of. Rick is the protagonist. The film ends with him rejecting his best friend and choosing women over men (gender conflict is a massive theme throughout the film) and joining the Hollywood cult.
Quite the contrary, the movie feels like absolutely nothing happens and everything you've seen means literally nothing until the very end. Specially Leo's part. He was just there to be a plot device and for the meme flamethrower scene. Everything else about his character was boring, except one scene (the one with the little girl. which in turn was pointless).
Why though? A film *about* Manson would have been far more interesting.
>growing up in orphanages and prison
>learning Scientology and mind control techniques
>build up a cult of young dropouts living in the desert having sex and hearing encrypted messages in Beatles songs
>hanging out with the Beach Boys
>try to kick off race war
But no, instead the kikesucking wigger Tarantino wants to indulge in his foot fetish and undirected 60s nostalgia, show Sharon Tate walking around aimlessly, vintage beer commercials, and some celebrities partying at the Playboy mansion. To what end? Not saying he would need to totally discard the 2 main characters, but the Manson family is basically just presented as caricatures of evil and stupidity. Because Tarantino is completely incapable of any kind of character subtlety. They are just vehicles for dialog and plot progression.
>la creatura
Wasn't pointless, seems like you're just a dumb shit who missed the point
What was the point then, brainlet?
it was from the movie dumass
You're talking about a completely different film, the entire point of this film is to overshadow Manson and his cult and make it seem like a ridiculous sect of weird losers. It's a fairy tale for adults where Sharon Tate lives and the goofy bad guys (i.e. Manson Family) get slaughtered.
There's plenty of subtlety to Rick and Cliff and their relationship. Why would Tarantino not use original characters to explore the fairy tale he's trying to create and instead limit himself to a notorious killer?
what is the point of building up how much of a badass brad pitt is, when all did was kill two chicks and a faggot in the end? and he even had a pitbull and a friend with a flame thrower helping him. the final showdown wasn't even remotely a fair fight desu, there were zero stakes involved