I don’t get it
I don’t get it
Carter Torres
Matthew Carter
basically you're a faggot
James Butler
16
Jacob Brooks
second post correct post
Angel Brown
I haven't tried this () shit in literal decades because I never needed to but I'll give it a go to see if I remember correctly.
The answer is 8 right?
Jaxson Torres
8/2(2+2)=
4/1(4)=
4/4=1
Brandon Mitchell
Order of operations is slightly different amongst countries. Some multiply first, some divide.
Isaac Miller
its 1
8/2(2+2) os a fraction
8 Over 2(2+2)
parenthesis
8 Over 2(4)
distribute
8 Over 8
8 Over 8 is one
Josiah Jenkins
it's not well-defined because the operators * and / are not mixed associative
Robert Parker
Dylan Fisher
(2+2)=4
8 ÷2=4
4x4=16
How do you not know elementary school level mathematics?
Jace Gonzalez
but there is no multiplication here
Jaxson Sanders
Blake Johnson
hello? retard department?
Jaxon Rivera
Based mathlet. There is a multiplication.
Owen Jones
>american education
Hunter Martin
() in math means to multiply
Carter Price
answer is 1 or 16, it depends
Austin Stewart
its not 1
when the order is not obvious you go left to right after doing what is obvious order of operations
the correct answer is 16
Leo Peterson
So is this why most countries cant get to the moon, they are fucking retarded?
Please show me where you see the 2(2+2) being together as a demoninator, its clearly 4X4=16.
Jace Young
This, here its BIDMAS
Brackets, Indicies, Division, Multiplication, Addition, Subtraction.
Easton Flores
No one should use divisions signs past high school. Everything can be simply written as fractions.
Adam Butler
Wrong.It's from a japanese test taken in high schools,basically they read from right to left.So the real answer would be:2+2=4 then multiply by 2 that's 8 and 8:8 is 1.The answer is 1.
Jonathan Young
Yes, this. Its 1.
Gabriel Campbell
This must be bait. Please god.
Matthew Young
no its not
in this instance you go left to right after doing the parenthesis
Ethan Murphy
PEMDAS
ITS 1
Cooper Ward
8 / 2(2 + 2)
8 / 2 x (4)
4 x 4
16
Justin Flores
lol
Caleb Bailey
Ah ok, so you multiply by the thing in the ()'s rather than add up, all I remembered is that you solve the thing in the () first.
Also forgive me if I'm using the wrong words, I'm not from an English country.
Christian Rogers
its 1
Michael Butler
wrong
Caleb Rogers
1x1=2
Camden Gonzalez
I browse with mentally handicapped
Owen Walker
Is this the deaignated brainlet thread?
Adam Foster
in what backasswards shithole does () mean multiplication lmao
Camden Moore
That is literally the answer reading left to right...
Nolan Smith
>le edgy order of operations troll post
Stop wasting time on this shit when there are brainlets on this board who still don’t even get pic related.
Jonathan Jackson
where you you see the 2(2+2) is connected in any way? Itd 8÷2×(2+2). Now read left to right with me.
8÷2=4.
2+2=4
4×4=16
For a group of smug assholes Yas Forums is fucking dumb
Parker Green
> 8/2x4
only a retard would write an operation like this, any sane human being would put a parenthesis to estabilish the order
Matthew Evans
8/2 = 4
2+2 = 4
4(4)= 16
Ethan Gomez
idiots
William Foster
yes but you got to demonstrate how you came to that conclusion,and solving it from left to right altough its the same result is not correct and allowed,because of that gook right to left reading
Luis Baker
One of the best threads on Yas Forums today actually.
Its 1.
Kayden Cooper
naturally, 8/2 is taken to mean 8*2^(-1). so 8/2(2+2)=8*2^(-1)*(2+2)=8*2^(-1)*4=8*2=16
Luke Peterson
left to right is 16 you retard
right to left is 1
James Perry
wrong
Joshua Nelson
IT DEPENDS ON WHETER YOU READ FROM LEFT TO RIGHT OR RIGHT TO LEFT
Christopher Edwards
8÷2(2+2)=1
8/2(2+2)=16
Anwser is 1
Evan Diaz
nobody in math fucking reads right to left
Charles Young
When is it ever done right to left?
Lincoln Ross
I really hope this is bait
Sebastian Martin
>RIGHT TO LEFT
Michael King
16
Remember BODMAS user!
Logan Ross
you wrote the exact same thing
Asher Young
wrong
Isaac Richardson
Holy brainlet
Daniel Young
The conventions in the late 19th century and still in use for most mathematical journals and some calculators hold juxtapositional multiplication - (4)(4) - as holding higher precedence than explicit multiplication or division. This impulse can be intuited by rewriting the expression as "8 / 4x for x=2+2"
Joseph Peterson
That notation is ambiguous. Troll harder.
Hunter Fisher
WHERE DID THE LEFT SIDE 4 COME FROM, I'M DYING LOL
Nicholas Watson
the japanese read from right to left .that equation op posted is from a japanese test taken in highscool
Jace Ortiz
Nice bait m8.
Using bidmas you get 8÷8=1
Julian Rivera
No I didn't enter it in a online or own calculator and see for yourself
Thomas Reyes
Ryder Gonzalez
mathematics major vs computer science major
Everyone in this thread is 100% serious.
Aiden Hill
language is not math
Lincoln Robinson
It doesn't matter whether the mnemonic you learned was PEMDAS or BODMAS, because either way it was (P)(E)(MD)(AS) or (B)(O)(DM)(AS).
Josiah Lee
The core of the problem is whether or not the 2 outside of the parenthesis is considered part of the parenthesis step or not. Apparently it isn't.
>Bimdas
What's the i?
Hunter Turner
DAMN YOU NIGGAS RETARDED
Elijah Martinez
>you start off with two values on one side of the equation and in the process of multiplying them one of the values go's missing
wat
William Campbell
Of course it is, how else do you remove the brackets? You multiply whats within by whats outside leaving 8/8.
i = indices aka powers
Christian Myers
it's 6
anyone who disagrees is dumb and prolly an idiot lmao
Logan Morgan
You remove the brackets by adding 2+2 dumbass. Its not like its algebra and you need to solve for x.
The way you are seeing it like
8÷[2(2+2)] which its not.
Brandon Bennett
correct
John Morales
If the 2 were outside of the parenthesis, i.e. it's to be multiplied following whatever is inside the parenthesis, it and the function in the parenthesis would be surrounded by brackets. However, it's joined in the function of 8/2.