>the animals listed as "ok" to eat have plenty of good meat to be eaten where as a dog and bat do not
arbitrary
>dogs are domesticated animals you are supposed to have as pets that also have shitty meat
subjective
>top
>instant death
>bottom
>skinned and boiled alive
strawman
yeah chickens have so much good meat on them
How about we not eat carnivores?
>it's less efficient to eat dogs when they can work for us
>but I'll eat horse
Based retard
>strawman
no u retard its fact
go skin some more animals alive you fucking subhuman
Is this one of those whores who sells poop cookies?
they do though especially in relation to their size. a bat is mostly skin and what meat it does have is shitty. a dog depending on breed COULD have meat but considering that they are mammalian carnivores they dont usually have good meat regardless
Their entire bodies and several of their organ meats?
absolute strawman. I never mention anything about dogs having to be pets. They just have shitty meat compared to animals that are clearly better options (chickens, pigs, cows)
The point was what animals can and can't be eaten not how they're treated.
Yet you addressed the latter.