who were the best colonizers?
Who were the best colonizers?
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
news18.com
timesofindia.indiatimes.com
kiro7.com
youtube.com
jiji.com
faz.net
twitter.com
thestar.com.my
newsweek.com
trialsitenews.com
en.m.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
Dutch then Brits
If you're redpilled, the Dutch were considerably better than the rest.
dutch > english > spanish > portuguese > french
in terms of effectiveness
What criteria determines the best?
Those that ethnically cleansed the conquered area and than settled it with their own people, e.g. North America and Australia.
explain your reasoning
I will take any criteria
That's the worst, from a certain perspective.
dutch
they were all trash
They left us alone more than the Brits.
We were hands down the best.
French cause they are good guys
Then the Brits were, as their colonies ended up the most successful.
i don't think the based department can process all these applications at the same time
youtube.com
Gli Italiani mio fratello
Ah yes, greatly successful nations such as Jamaica, India, Egypt, Tanzania, Cameroon and Sierra Leone. Who could forget?.
Russia, because they were the only ones who succeeded in integrating most of their colonial holdings into the mainland.
Japanese
The Dutch created the good part of South Africa, cute islands territories like Curaçao, Aruba, Bonaire and Saint Marteen, also colonized Indonesia that is not bad.
>explain
G E K O L O N I S E E R D
yes, and as a result british culture and language are the most widespread globally compared to the other colonizers. I guess they really were the best.
Russia only managed to do that because they were connected directly by land. Also Australia and Canada are technically still part of the British Empire.
Z E G M A K K E R
India is successful though.
They were nerfed by the Brits' greed of natural resources.
If you judge by what they left behind, the British
Japan is colonizer but not colonizer.
Korea commit to Japan as soilders and police but not commit to Japan.
Japan invaded Korea but not invaded because of annexation.
Japan developed Korea but not developed Korea because Korea enjoy or not.
We don’t know the past exactly forever. Nobody can figure out and research it.
JAPAN SAVES THE WORLD
India ranks Japan's Avigan and Actemra as most promising drugs against Covid-19.
news18.com
India: Avigan and Actemra hold most potential in Covid-19 fight
timesofindia.indiatimes.com
Kirkland doctor who nearly died from COVID-19 recovers after taking Japan's Actemra
kiro7.com
>On a ventilator and in a coma for more than two weeks, Michael Goldsmith was out of options before starting treatment on Actemra. Now doctors are calling him a “walking miracle.”
youtube.com
87% recovery Japan's Avigan - Thailand
jiji.com
Germany imports million Avigan tablets
faz.net
The Philippines ready to participate in clinical trials of Avigan
twitter.com
Four Asean nations among 38 to get Avigan drug from Japan for clinical trial
thestar.com.my
Russia to Try Antiviral Drug Avigan as Coronavirus Treatment
newsweek.com
Egypt "Fujifilm's Avigan is one of the best"
trialsitenews.com
BTW, "Favipiravir" is a chink knock-off name to piggyback on Japan's success.
It's hard to pronounce, such a retarded name.
Use "Avigan", the official Japanese brand name, way easier to pronounce and memorize
We wuz colonizas n shid nigguh
USA colonies
>S.Korea
>Japan
>Taiwan
>S.Vietnam (golden years)
>all of Western Europe
>Canada
>Panama
>Cuba (golden years)
>based little islands full of happy fat men
Sounds good to me
Everything they touch turns to gold which jealous neighbours clamour over
Ah yes, such utopias like the Philippines, the northern triangle of Central America and Iraq, who could forget?
Russians
why the fuck are lith and lat green
Philippines is shit because they have innately low IQ, central America is a drug/banana farm
Saddam was too pure for this world
>is shit because they have innately low IQ
As observed from a totally unbiased source such as Vietnam, of course.