Do americans choose their leader based on whose brain is rotting at a faster rate or based on who has the shittiest...

I wanted to root for Biden because he was so clowny. He was like a lefty and nicer version of Trump. Mr. poor kids and white kids. But he such a non-presence this primary. Dems voted him i because he's the safest bet against Trump not because they actually support. Plus Berniefags souring the well for losing. Old Joe just doesn't have it.

wtf

Hillary is into /ss/? Nice.

I wouldn't rule it out. The mass majority of voters only care about the economy. If the economy is good, the incumbent has an advantage, but the US is going to be in a depression when they vote. Trump is not the man to fix this, and he is going to get punished for it on election day, regardless of who the Democrat candidate is.

>Barbie is out
No. The dementia is soon going to drop dead with corona-chan for some reason. And then bunny will be back.

Attached: 9CtYMjt.jpg (1392x788, 118.74K)

>China is censoring research on COVID-19

Does China have some iron fist rule over every single virology research centre on the globe or something? Or they snatch samples as soon as the virus is taken out of patients?

China came out with a research paper regarding new strains just yesterday.

hillary will announce her running on october 2020
mark these, you heard it here first

Attached: cYl1Z-YobzIF4seViLvXya38XkePlrM0UR-ovo-o3_w.png (470x471, 109.72K)

Actually, a bunch of corporations come together and decide. Late-stage capitalism, baby.

>choose
It's funny to me that you think any kind of rational thought process is involved in presidential elections anymore. President is whoever makes for funnier reaction images and gets you the most (You)'s and this is why we all deserve to burn.

Attached: 12476979586.png (869x736, 1.36M)

He was probably refering to this article and not research in general: theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/11/china-clamping-down-on-coronavirus-research-deleted-pages-suggest

Attached: _20200418_110657.jpg (720x701, 90.78K)

uh with biden and trump as only choices blue square would win either way

>based on whose brain is rotting at a faster rate
Fucking this. He's literally approaching 80 how can he be fit for office

why do american politicians age so bad?

Attached: silviotoast.jpg (1160x865, 116.02K)

>"pages were accessed from online caches"
>Article doesn't mention the content of the documents at all
>Literally just "China may do something bad in the future according to our interpretation"

Of course, that journalist didn't mention that in the past, Beijing complained that some researchers were publishing half-assed articles.
scientificamerican.com/article/low-quality-studies-belie-hype-about-research-boom-in-china/

Nope, the propaganda requires that the only explanation is China BAD.

>CHYNA BAD
That's all they really need to publish to generate clicks. 99% of the readership is going to twke it at face value, a bunch of them will spam it on their facebook profile and the fringe outliers who bother to both look up the context or correct and errors will be called paid Chinese shills.
What is kind of scary is that even the past couple of American led invasions of the middle east had dissenting opinions within western media. On the subject of China, they are all pretty much in lockstep with cold war era tier paranoia and often outright racism.

I like how retarded milquetoast college liberals voted for this senile neoliberal warhawk.

they're 70

>vote for 4 more years of accelerated aging under the constant cacophony of orange man
>or
>vote for the man who promised to give Beta Francis O'Rorke total reign on gun control policy

Attached: 1586988295895.jpg (700x700, 35.12K)

Can't smell children if your nose is covered.

he is 85

NANI?!

hello zhang

>tf
>tp

>how can he be fit for office
he quite literally is not
youtube.com/watch?v=PpMAd7uXMSY