Temperature can go to millions of degrees to the upside but only -270 or so, explain that, sciencefags

>0 movement is easy to simulate but too much movement puts strain on the system so it needs to have a cap
heh..

if water boils at 100 degrees how can some US states have recorded temperatures over 100 degrees? How do Americans survive????

I can reverse in a car

100 farenheit is like 38 celsius

>we live in a simulation
Yes: the content of your mind is a simulation of reality

not sure if bait or not

This.

If you take the definition for temperature as the rate of variation of entropy with respect to energy of a system, which is almost always equivalent to the definition as the speed of the particles, you could obtain negative temperatures in the case of a system with an upper bound on the particle's energy.

never read into it too much but iirc with 2 objects, energy will flow from the one with "negative" temperature to any other object that has positive temperature as it's actually hotter
and even then, atoms have unlimited number of high energy states, never heard where the upper bound actually applies irl

it’s not easy, it’s a theoretical limit, which we can’t really reach.
it’s speculated that during the Big Bang that limit was surpassed

What no, movement of atoms induces thermal radiation not the other way around, cold is a word for saying that baryons don't emit high energy/lot EM waves according to human's thermorecepting standard. 0 kelvin = baryons don't move, don't collide therefore no traduction of kinetic energy into thermal energy as EM waves (infra red and below). Neutron star heat is not generated by atomic collisions

This is a special type of stupid.

lmao y'all virgins go have sex or sumtin instead of reedin ur books 'n shit

there is no reason to complicate it to subatomic particles

I don't know

ya fat nerd

Life as we know it is indeed only possible at very low temperatures relative to the universal scale.

underrated post

>american education

Universe is mainly empty cold space, it certainly balances the small number of stars in the observable universe. I mean, the entire solar system (except the sun) could fit into the distance between the earth and the moon, the nearest star, proxima centauri is about 4.22*~9460 billion km, all this just empty space, sometimes some frozen rocks on the way. The space between galaxies is even wider, emptier, colder than interstellar medium. It's a big empty, cold space with some stars heating a small area around them, I haven't calculated the odds but I speculate that 20° celsius is a decent temperature in universe

The redpillled way of looking at this is from statistical physics. Using statistics on quantum physics to derive thermodynamic relations gives all the insight you need. Then shit like entrophy and heat will make sense.

Goobers like einstein are overrated. Deybe, boltzman and fermi are the real deal.