What the fuck was their problem?

What the fuck was their problem?

Attached: brits.png (1808x1640, 1M)

wouldnt trust this

who even were were britons at that time ?

i mean it was before:
>normans
>gemans(saxons)
>roman major influence

what is even left besides a spooky island?

t.coping brit

Celtic tribes speaking a P Celtic language like the Gauls. Many of them shared kinship and other ties with Gallic tribes across the channel, right up to the Roman invasion

soul

Romans called them britunculi which meant something like 'miserable little britons'

Hue

welsh people.
the English say they aren't welsh but that is just cope for exterminating them.
we have songs from the 7th century that came from the east of England talking about them being welsh

lads from Cornwall

>britunculi
Brittunculi, with two T

>Right up to the Roman invasion.
And for many years later. Its not a coincidence the "gallic empire" that existed during the crisis of the 3rd century consisted of gaul and britannia. Even when the romans evacuated the island and the saxons started invading some of the celts fled into modern day britanny to escape.

Bongmonculi! You foking bongmonculus, you! lel

Though seriously, Romans liked to spin bullshit about people they fought with for propaganda reasons.

the romans said a lot of shit, doesn't mean it's real

they had genuine admiration for "savages" like germanics and britons, just like today we have documentaries where the indigenous tribes of Amazonia are praised for their resourcefulness and adaptability in a harsh environment

have they ever changed?

Attached: 1580676347021.jpg (1000x879, 478.32K)

swampnigqer cope

Very interested in that swamp bit

England was a giant swamp in late antiquity/early middle ages

sod off nonce

Attached: 1566945096073.png (1366x768, 76.82K)

the romans also said the britons had the same language as the ancient estonians, do you believe them about that too?

Well, parts of it were.

At the end of the day the Britons numbered in the hundreds of thousands at least, so it's obviously not believable that they didn't till fields and grow crops, and they didn't solely live off hunting swamp animals

not exactly accurate, but lots of areas would have been more boggy than they are today,

>Romans

Attached: Screenshot_20200319-233703.png (720x1440, 495.42K)

read this book at the start of the year, very interesting but takes a while to warm up to the writing style

Honestly, considering how autistic medieval authors were, this is like poetry to my ears now. Like you just wanna read a history of the Franks but the nigga keeps pontificating about circumcision, baka baka

Attached: IMG_20200101_222139472~2.jpg (4160x1794, 1.4M)

From the same quote
>for all emergencies they prepare a certain kind of food, the eating of a small
portion of which, the size of a bean, prevents them from feeling either hunger or thirst

wtf, do brits really go swim in the swamps when they are hungry?

the eastern english are the truest english

if it is not latin, you are not reading medieval history

I'm pretty new to reading first hand accounts so it was an adjustment to me

swamps are suprisingly warm in the winter and you can catch ducks/rats/squirrels/newts/frogs/bugs really easily

I'm working on it, I swear ;-;

History major?

how could you bare the enlgish cold if you live naked?

nope 27 year old biologist. Im just interested in history but far from an academic. I'm dan carlin tier at best

Who shuld I believe
>romans who were actually there
or
>coping bongs 1.5 thousand years later

I already have my answer

Vuelve a tu clase en linea, bebo.

My ancestors :)