They are wrong, because I'm 100% straight.
When did you realise that you don't actually exist?
>Only sheep adopt these identifiers others give them.
err so LGBT activists?
Kek, ironically christcucks have accepted evolution
At least Catholics
If that's true then how did I have a long-distance relationship with a Russian femboy
The legit did that study by showing gay porn to a couple of people then looked if their eyes twitched
>Ritch savin williams
The faggot that did the study has been pushin fag propaganda since the 70
Ofc also
>whom he affectionately referred to as his “Jewish mother” ...
What a stupid fucking post, with no classification and categorization there is no reflexion possible. Retarded gay faggot nigger-word f*nn
What I meant is that scientists can suggest all kinds of things and that doesn't mean that it is correct
Couple of decades ago gays were no longer mentally ill on paper because they were "born this way", but today there are proofs that people aren't born with pre-installed sexual orientation
>All zoomers listen to trance(not related to trannies) and ghetto rap about doing drugs and having random sexual connections, unfortunately
Based.
yes, but also equally the anti-LGBT people.
Obviously there's nothing morally wrong with calling yourself straight or gay. But it's like being proud over your country, the local variant of the religion you were born into or the color of your shirt: it's an identity that comes from the outside and that only has value in relation to others. It doesn't help you grow as a person. It's only for show, a matter of social status.
That most of these people don't see it this way doesn't mean it wasn't true. A non-sheep person would construct their own self-identity that wasn't reliant on others.
I only like girls (female) and girls (male) so I'm 100% straight