Mass Immigration? Sure, that's great for both my country and the developing country...

Mass Immigration? Sure, that's great for both my country and the developing country, so long as it is temporary/rotational and well managed.

Attached: 15669122680004a46634502af7b93ce36d27b59029fb7ab4bb25aa6bb6e598f82f0831687de44ebf59061555e6d51deda431d1d6acfb0462b85dbd04d7f724bf98f4134f40ad1.jpg (236x284, 7.01K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/a1jAURcMt80
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Attached: 4kids.png (465x348, 134.02K)

>Mass Immigration
>temporary
AHAHAHAHAHAHA

Attached: 745.png (327x316, 210.62K)

why would a child be extolling the virtues of having lower labour costs in an economy whilst not having the same social obligations to your workers?

why not?
the mass of migrants who come to the uk these days are students. only a miniscule number end up staying on and getting working visas.

only a fraction of migrants actually settle.
what i'm saying is that a well designed immigration system can incentivise greater compliance with the rules and even dissuade people from wanting to stay.

check bradford demographics mate, try walking around there and tell us if you changed your opinion

Attached: 1580417914946.jpg (679x513, 300.39K)

bradford isnt an example of temporary migration is it.

they migrated in the 60s.

Attached: me.png (1200x675, 510K)

That's what Germans said about the Turks in the 1960s lol

>So long as it's women only*