Why do they LARP as latin in their weird rituals?

Why do they LARP as latin in their weird rituals?

Attached: 1572070103467.png (1200x600, 5.03K)

Other urls found in this thread:

britannica.com/topic/Anglicanism
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elizabethan_Religious_Settlement
youtube.com/watch?v=dCDMGu-xi30
youtube.com/watch?v=GRxofEmo3HA
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

why do you larp as civilised humans

which weird rituals

Why are Brits unable to handle banter?

to get the gullible victims to put their guard down

Attached: dca.jpg (660x440, 49.99K)

the stuff they do with their German royal family and such

it's funny how this image doesn't just apply to meds desu

Attached: 1576500178035.png (1114x677, 505K)

European royalty does not have a nationality, they are a distinct class of inbred Euromutt with ancestors from all across the continent. The fact some of them inhabited and governed a region of Germany does not make them German.

Maximum cope, nigel

Didn’t Germans try to emulate Roman architecture, culture and style for 99% of their history despite having never even been governed or directly influenced by Romans? I’m not sure which is worse desu.

>Didn’t Germans try to emulate Roman architecture, culture and style for 99% of their history
no
>despite having never even been governed or directly influenced by Romans?
not true either
southern and western Germany were under Roman rule for centuries

>southern and western Germany were under Roman rule for centuries
So? Germs didn't live there

Germans have no right to call out other people's Roman LARPing.

Attached: smug french.jpg (336x422, 17.92K)

It’s the truth. Nationality means nothing to that class of people. They saw themselves as having purer blood, being chosen directly by God to rule. The rest of us were just commoner peasants. Pic related shows Tsar Nicholas II and King George V. They were more closely related to each other than they were to their subjects, despite England and Russia being separated by an entire continent. When Russia fell to civil war, King George begged Parliament to offer the Tsar refuge from the revolutionaries, but rescinded his offer after Parliament told him to be quiet. Why would he do such a thing if he did not feel kinship with the Tsar? You need to look at history through the contemporary context. Our modern royal family might see themselves and be accepted as British icons, but that wasn’t always the case. The nobility were distinct genetically and culturally from the people they governed for most of history.

>no
Really nigga

Attached: 85B58193-5971-4EBA-99E2-9B4B7AE9EF79.jpg (1920x1080, 574.55K)

you should know it better, your entire country only exists because of a series of giant roman larps

yeah it applies to half of germany too

yes really. Look at medieval German architecture, clothing, "style". Apart from the Latin alphabet and language used by the clergy and thus intellectual elite (which was the case in all of Latin/Catholic Europe, not just Germany), Germans didn't emulate shit from Romans. People unironically claiming that the HRE was some sort of LARP is just a secure sign that they never spent a single afternoon reading about it.

lotta words there.

Is this the canonical cope mechanism bongs use for their royal family not being British?

What cope do you use for your former colony cucking you and destroying your empire?

There is more Roman larping in German history than just the medieval HRE

German architecture and ideals throughout the 19th and early 20th century were heavily influenced by the Romans, or at least their idea of what Romans were like. Germany is not free of Roman larp. Germany partook in it just like the rest of the continent.

Attached: 5198342E-8351-43FB-A053-CBFE8950BE67.jpg (640x378, 64.85K)

Using a building style is nowhere near the LARP level of using Latin to address the Queen or whatever

What are you talking about you schizophrenic freak? Did you even read my post or did you just write it off as cope because you hate learning new things? The British royal family not being genetically British is not unusual or surprising. You’d be hard pressed to find any royalty in the world that isn’t mixed.

>Getting heated
anglo cope confirmed

This is a really poor understanding of the evolution of monarchy. Romans would not recongise any of our rituals around monarchy because most rituals around monarchy arose after the fall of Rome, especially as a result of the Carolingian Emperors who are the real fathers of modern monarchic institution. Even Byzantine monarchy is unrecognisable to a western European monarch.

Neoclassicism wasn't limited to Germany.
>Germany partook in it just like the rest of the continent.
yeah no shit, but that's not helping your argument that the HRE was somehow a larp
plus Neoclassicism came after the HRE

Trojan Turk deep state rules Britain.

>great britain is a land of subhumans ruled by euromutt aristocrats who are genetically unrelated to 99.999% of the UK
interesting argument there nigel

The Queen can actually trace her ancestry back to Alfred the Great, which makes her more English than you.

How so? Is it not the same thing? Trying to emulate their culture? Seems a bit arbitrary to say one thing is worse than the other, no?
Fuck out my country and crawl back to whatever dank colonial shithole you were spawned in you inbred, smooth brained shit skinned cunt.
So you agree with me? The point we’re discussing is whether Germany larped as Roman or not. The image in OP claims it didn’t. I’m claiming it did.

Was referencing this image, not OP’s. My mistake

Why are Germans so Anglophobic bros? Every German I meet is really rude to me :(

I'm not OP and also not the dude who posted that edited Roman Empire map

Absolutely furious, LMAO.

Language LARP is 200x worse than having some neoclassical buildings. You do it to this day!

we're actually not at all apart from Yas Forums posters
Germans like the UK and all our zoomers go to Australia or New Zealand for a year after school

>Language LARP
You mean like France or Spain which speak Latin languages despite not being Latin genetically?

No that's just called language. You use Latin for an air of legitimacy in formal royal proceedings

We use Latin because it was once the language of the church you retard and monarchy in Europe has been completely wound up with Christianity for over 1500 years.

monarchy is so fucking retarded just abolish it already

>"""Protestant"""" but keep a bunch of papistisms
oh no no no no

Anglos are literally the least larping people in Europe

Here you reveal your historical illiteracy. England has never been protestant. The church of England was specifically created as way to unite Catholics and protestants under the crown. Read up on the religious settlement.

How does eastern/northern europe larp?

>When Russia fell to civil war, King George begged Parliament to offer the Tsar refuge from the revolutionaries, but rescinded his offer after Parliament told him to be quiet.
based parliament, fuck the romanovs

Attached: germtrashpidoras dies.jpg (1024x577, 79.79K)

britannica.com/topic/Anglicanism
>Anglicanism, one of the major branches of the 16th-century Protestant Reformation...

They larp by being modest, kind in civilized while in reality are utter orange cunts with superiority complex

The Brits are a strange case to be sure: they were willing to sell their country to any random German prince with the sole stipulation that they not be Catholic and yet their elite culture features such Latin artifacts as the prestigious, latinate high church anglicanism, the classics curriculum at Oxbridge and the nob grand tour of Europe which basically encompassed Paris and Italy.

Hate to break it to you, but they are, in fact, superior to you. Just about everyone is.

You are just posting nonsense out of anger at the moment

Anglicanism isn't protestant in any meaningful way. It is just Catholicism with the monarch at the head instead. It why actual protestants left the church en masse and created other groups like Methodism and Presbyterianism.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elizabethan_Religious_Settlement

>The Elizabethan Settlement, sometimes called the Revolution of 1559,[1] was an attempt to end this religious turmoil. The Act of Supremacy of 1558 re-established the Church of England's independence from Rome, and Parliament conferred on Elizabeth the title of Supreme Governor of the Church of England. The Act of Uniformity of 1559 re-introduced the Book of Common Prayer from Edward's reign, which contained the liturgical services of the church, but some modifications were made to appeal to Catholics and Lutherans. The modifications included giving individuals greater latitude concerning belief in the real presence of Christ in the Eucharist and permission to use traditional priestly vestments. In 1571, the Thirty-Nine Articles were adopted as a confessional statement for the church, and a Book of Homilies was issued outlining the church's reformed theology in greater detail.

Anglicanism is a purely political form of Christianity, designed to appeal to as many Christians as possible in the name of political stability.

Perfidious, even in religion

The Anglish are pure Anglo-Saxon. I know because I am pure Saxon from the Teutonic Order.

Attached: 0_q2zXAyqM9NbwcEPM.png (1280x859, 1.49M)

>the country literally called the holy roman empire for 1000 or so years really asks this question

I'm not German nor do I live there.

I just picked a flag which will get actual discussion and replies on Yas Forums

Yeah, we should have had a huge religious war like the continent instead, great idea. Fuck compromise!

>pure Anglo-Saxon
>existing
They blanda upped with the Celtic British population
Englishmen are mutts

sure fritz

the emigration from Germany to England was substantial though from at least hansard times onwards. There are nearly as many English with German surnames as there are German-Americans.

Meme answers aside, we don't know anything about pre-roman religion, culture etc. So we have to larp as romans. It's embarassing as no other country idoloises their former imperial masters

As if it was some genius political move and not solely the result of Henry VIII wanting to remarry

youtube.com/watch?v=dCDMGu-xi30

so you have no defense for it gotcha

you can say that about every singe "nation" in europe

only insular, irrelevant ones have claim to a "pure" heritage, and even then DNA testing shows that their conquerors usually make up a significant proportion of their heritage

shh don't say it so loud or we'll lose our ammo against mutts

The English know plenty about Anglo-Saxon religion. It is only the Druids who were cucked out of existence.

>As if it was some genius political move and not solely the result of Henry VIII wanting to remarry
That is another huge misunderstanding of Anglicanism. The Anglicanism of Henry VIII was nothing like the Anglicanism of Elizabeth I. Between those two monarchs there were huge periods of change, with Edward's attempt to protestanise the church and Mary's attempt to bring the Church of England back in line with Rome. Henry's decision was purely personal but Elizabeth's was political and it was designed to bring the country back together after Mary's reign which was extremely divisive.

Germans have no right to call people Larpers YOU larped as Romans YOU adopted both Hellenic and Roman/Italic architecture and also adopted their musical practices. Oh wait you thought you invented Opera and Baroque, no bitch.

youtube.com/watch?v=GRxofEmo3HA

Defence for what? For us using latin for some of our monarchical traditions? Are you blissfully unaware of common culture between the European monarchcal traditions or are you just playing stupid?