/balt/ + /ausnz/

>worst dubbings from 90's
Oh, sweet!
In 90's ALL foreign shit in Latvia was in Russian.
Why? Because there was no monetary reason for dubing

>Tai, kad Vytautas Didysis ir Jogaila tarpusavy iki pat mirties kalbėjo lietuviškai, rodo vienas 1429 metų Vytauto laiškas Jogailai, kuriame Lietuvos valdovas primena Jogailai vieną situaciją Lucko suvažiavime rašydamas: prisimeni, kai mes tuo metu kalbėjome kalba, kurios niekas nesuprato? >Lucko suvažiavime dalyvavęs Šv. Romos imperatorius Zigmantas Liuksemburgas mokėjo vokiečių, lenkų ir rusėnų kalbas, vadinasi, mūsų valdovai tam, kad jų nesuprastų, tarpusavy galėjo kalbėtis tik lietuviškai.

i wonder what mental gymnastics will you use now

i love how you try to paint yourself as some sort of rational thinker yet you deliberately ignore all the evidence that that the ruling class spoke lithuanian
neck yourself incel

>Lithuanian tribes
The territory of the Balts, including modern Lithuania, was once inhabited by several Baltic tribal entities (Aukštaitians, Sudovians, Old Lithuanians, Curonians, Semigallians, Selonians, Samogitians, Skalvians, Old Prussians (Nadruvians)), as attested by ancient sources and dating from prehistoric times. Over the centuries, and especially under the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, some of these tribes consolidated into the Lithuanian nation, mainly as a defence against the marauding Teutonic Order and Eastern Slavs. The last Pagan peoples in Europe, they were eventually converted to Christianity in 1387.
>>locals disproportional majority nobility
>>underrepresenting themselves
Just count up how many nobles had baltic origins and how many had ruthenian ones. Now consider that balts were like 10% of gdl population.

Your mental gymnastics are funny.

I'm done arguing with this retard. Have fun convincing him through his down syndrome.

I feel sorry for you cant feel same time dostaltic yet laugh same time for poor dubs.
youtube.com/watch?v=1T_TLBZxY4U

Attached: laughing-cats.jpg (600x450, 50.61K)

Don't even know what these 2 argue about

>Not a single one of your statements has ONE SHRED OF HISTORICAL EVIDENCE. IN ANY SOURCE. NOTHING FACTUAL.
lt.litviny.net/lietuvos-didikai.html
read up faggot, all the evidence with sources is provided

Attached: 1562702041579.jpg (242x242, 7.49K)

LOOK AT THE SOURCE FOR SAID STATEMENT, YOU AUTISTIC FAGGOT. Just because a Lithuanian nationalist punched out a theoretical article on his personal website, having no historical sources whatsoever to back his theorems up does not make his statements a true fact.
Your quoted statement is just the same shit I answered in the previous thread. It's all based on that letter which doesn't mention or imply Lithuanian in ANY kind of way.

Why IN THE FUCK are you attributing that book to any ruler of Lithuania? AT ALL? Specially Vytautas/Jogaila(using names used in our country today).

Absolute retarded ultra-nationalists. Again, 0 evidence and makes declarative statement "ruling class spoke lithuanian" ... Brilliant. It's like talking to a Jesus freak. "Such is the word of God, how can you be so stupid?!"