If the Question and Mr. A are supposed to be objectivist superheroes written by objectivist Steve Ditko...

Ditko was not an objectivist, he followed his own philosophy that was partially BASED on objectivism. A core part of that philosophy was that man should actively fight against evil. He viewed the policeman as the ideal man should strive towards and wished he had chosen that path in life himself.

A more accurate comparison would be with the Church of Satan. It's according to the founder Anton LaVey it's literally just Objectivism with added ceremonies, rituals and other stupid but ultimately harmless spoopy shit /x/ loves.

Most people hate on them due to the same lazy knee-jerk reactions. With Satanism it's because "Satan" is literally right in the name, and with Objectivism it's Ayn Rand's ESL use of the word "selfish".

I wonder what Spider-Man and Doctor Strange would have been like if they had been created after Ditko went full Ayn Rand.

Largely in the vein of post-issue 20 ASM.
Which was the better part of Ditko's run anyway. The Goblin/Crime Master story is one of my all time favorite Spidey stories.

Attached: 1426451545899.jpg (1280x1788, 580.73K)

I think he would have refused to do Dr Strange. His later art showed intelligent people relying on LOGIC and REASON and KNOWLEDGE with no room for mysticism. I bet he would have a clear-headed hero expose Dr Strange as a fraud and a charlatan.

"With great power comes no responsibility other than to live for oneself".

I hate Objectivism because of its more visible proponents... like Senator Rand Paul, who has been aching to take Medicare and Social Security away from old people since his college days.

"I'm rich, screw everybody else."

Stan Lee would have just written his way around it.

Social Security was created as a scam and should be done away with entirely.