One still makes me hope it will get better. Other was so boring it made me drop it. My vote is for Owl House
Let's settle this once and for all
Noah Butler
Liam Turner
Frogs.
>good release schedule
>high quality show
>excellent aesthetics
Witches:
>shit release schedule
>terribly in consistent quality and it peaks at 'pretty good' which is the lowest quality frog episode
>simplistic dull aesthetic
Brandon Rodriguez
Owl House has some very good thighs.
Juan Torres
Cringe
Alexander Perez
enjoy your toddler show with frogs faggit
Juan Gonzalez
Dumping 39 episodes in a month then leaving the fans hanging for half a year with no confirmation on a return date isn't a good schedule but otherwise I agree.
Only bright side to this is that Amphibia gets to be on Disney+ while Owl cucks are stuck to TV until season 1 ends.
Aiden Anderson
It's a fine release schedule. It released. People enjoyed it. It went away. You can argue that fortnightly or weeks releases add more to the 'discussion' and aide it in creating a lasting impression but NOTHING is worse than a mid-season hiatus.
Owl House is worse but I am even more frustrated with its short comings because it's infrequent.
Cooper Sullivan
More overt anime references, so panders to lorefag audience more. A lot of Amphibia episodes are basic sitcom plots that are primarily gag-driven, while TOH always shoehorns some sort of fantastical or worldbuilding element to keep the fanfic audience engaged (while being pretty much the same sort of plots if you disregard the superficial trimmings).
Also less cartoony, more fappable art
Christian Anderson
>Amphybia had potential
has
>both are full of shit and fillers
yes
Thomas Barnes
I am a lorefag and I will admit the light spell was the first episode I had any affection for.
That said, Amphibia certainly has better lore. To think otherwise is insane. Owl House could tell you anything and you'd be forced to simply say, yeah sure. Amphibia has more consistency in its presentation which gives weight to its revelations.