Attached: The.Rescuers.1974.1080p.BluRay.X264-AMIABLE.mkv_snapshot_03.jpg (1792x1080, 217.34K)
Let's have a Rescuers thread. Which film do you prefer?
John Richardson
Alexander Bailey
They both have their merits so it's hard to decide. That said the story flows better in the second one.
Mason Cook
>The Country of Africa
Cooper Jackson
why would mice give a shit about little kids?
Brayden Taylor
>I always prefered the first film. I felt like Bernard and Bianca were second billed in their own movie in 'Down Under'.
That’s always something I took issue with in the second movie.
However, I like the second one more because I feel the pacing is not as slow, and it’s a real visual treat. The first digitally shot animated film!
Gavin Torres
Again, I pitch my shared universe idea with The Great Mouse Detective, The Rescuers, and Chip and Dale's Rescue Rangers. Essentially one leads into the other, with Basil of Baker Street showing the effect that just one mouse can have, the formation of the Rescue Aid Society, which, by the time of Chip and Dale had fallen to squabbles and infighting, leaving the Rescue Rangers to pick up the pieces and prove that small critters can do big things.
Hudson Green
Is that using some sort of temporal smoothing filter or something? It makes it look like the cels are shadowing on the background. Looks like shit.
Luis Cook
He misled the rangers by tossing the kid's backpack to crocs and he tricked the kid into leading him to the eagle.
Cleverness doesn't need to equal booksmarts
Ryder Robinson
There's elements that were better here and there in the first one, but as a whole package, Down Under is objectively better.Those fucking gorgeous flying scenes, and this magnificent bastard.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't the guy who voiced the fat guy in the first movie the same one that voiced the Penguin in the Scooby Doo tie-in episodes from way back then?
Matthew Allen
>Africa
>country
I kek'd