Shameful admission Yas Forums, but there was a time when i unironically agreed with the sentiment of this comic

I can see someone posting this as bait, which is the central problem the comic doesn't really get. Most comments on the internet is bait meant to rile people up and any expectation of discussion is futile and naive.

I guess in the artists defense, this is a common problem you can find everywhere including Yas Forums itself. I mean how many very clearly off-topic twitter or clickbait threads meant specifically to insight anger gets 100+ replies here in Yas Forums?

I do feel a lot of people have problems with self-reflection, where the thought process seems to be, " is bad. I am not bad, therefore I cannot be ". And from there they latch onto any rationalization that lets them avoid thinking about it instead of approaching topics critically.

I especially see it a lot in the various media boards here. It gets ironic when posters want their comic books or video games to be taken seriously, but then get pissed off when other people do just that. It turns out that people stake a lot of their identity on the media they consoom, and because of this any criticism of that media is taken as a personal attack.

The trolls never give up it doesnt matter if you feed them or not .The birthplace of "weaponized" ""autism"" of all place should be aware of that. The birthplace of "Tits or GTFO" and "There is no woman on the Internet" should be aware of the bias as well but bury its collective head in the sand

I actually like the first page, just need to get rid of the dumb 'title'

>consoom
It started good but this shitty meme made me diregard your entire post
Talk like a fucking adult , "consoom" is "NPC" with a new fresh coat of paint, the self indulgent adolescent way of demarking yourself as "unique and special,not like the rest of sheeple"

Attached: 43689894353.png (952x1468, 921.05K)

That's actually fairly reasonable for one of these types.
She doesn't put a fatwah on all offensive persons.

Yeah, you're probably right. I like the extra sense of derision the word carries, but it also has those kind of implications like you say. I'm sick of wojack edits and usually avoid them, but when in Rome

>Hundreds of other comments.
>Focuses only on the bad ones.
Why do artists do this?

Yeah, it wasn't that bad though my issue with the "problematic" argument is that all of it is related to what they feel hits "close to home" with an arbitrary line on what sort of content even is "problematic".

Like yeah, RLM occasionally makes fun of women but for every women joke they have 10 jokes making fun of the elderly. Why is making fun of one group considered more heinous then the other?