Shameful admission Yas Forums, but there was a time when i unironically agreed with the sentiment of this comic

>Water is wet
No it's not.

Oh? Gonna need the sauce, boss.

I mean, the first two pages of the comic are spot on, and there is nothing false about them.

she should've called a him a creep and left it at that, no need to argue with simps.

I was mistaken, It was a different artist.

Attached: RedLetterMedia.jpg (983x792, 807.91K)

>your comic is so good it makes me want to fuck you
who has ever said that in the history of ever

Actually I see way more women ganging together against men than men do against women.

I find it amusing that every single character but one is represented as nothing but a gender symbol. Every person involved has literally no being, identity, or self, except for their gender.

>who has ever said that in the history of ever
9/11 just never happened dude, all the war in middle east is strictly american aggression with no provocation

The majority of people have neither the means nor the drive to have any significant effect on the greater whole of society except as directed by more influential people. The phrase 'silent majority' exists for a reason. But somehow life goes on, so outrage farming is only worth anything when it's used to promote the seeds of change. Real useful change, not "I pat myself on the back for being so smart" change. Even then, humanity has consistently failed it's own ideals and can be expected to keep doing so forever. But humanity still has those ideals and the act of living with them is worthwhile, as long as they are meaningful and beautiful. Nothing is new under the sun, but every sunrise is a new sunrise. Fuck I dunno. This metaphor got away from me.

I can see someone posting this as bait, which is the central problem the comic doesn't really get. Most comments on the internet is bait meant to rile people up and any expectation of discussion is futile and naive.

I guess in the artists defense, this is a common problem you can find everywhere including Yas Forums itself. I mean how many very clearly off-topic twitter or clickbait threads meant specifically to insight anger gets 100+ replies here in Yas Forums?

I do feel a lot of people have problems with self-reflection, where the thought process seems to be, " is bad. I am not bad, therefore I cannot be ". And from there they latch onto any rationalization that lets them avoid thinking about it instead of approaching topics critically.

I especially see it a lot in the various media boards here. It gets ironic when posters want their comic books or video games to be taken seriously, but then get pissed off when other people do just that. It turns out that people stake a lot of their identity on the media they consoom, and because of this any criticism of that media is taken as a personal attack.

The trolls never give up it doesnt matter if you feed them or not .The birthplace of "weaponized" ""autism"" of all place should be aware of that. The birthplace of "Tits or GTFO" and "There is no woman on the Internet" should be aware of the bias as well but bury its collective head in the sand

I actually like the first page, just need to get rid of the dumb 'title'

>consoom
It started good but this shitty meme made me diregard your entire post
Talk like a fucking adult , "consoom" is "NPC" with a new fresh coat of paint, the self indulgent adolescent way of demarking yourself as "unique and special,not like the rest of sheeple"

Attached: 43689894353.png (952x1468, 921.05K)

That's actually fairly reasonable for one of these types.
She doesn't put a fatwah on all offensive persons.

Yeah, you're probably right. I like the extra sense of derision the word carries, but it also has those kind of implications like you say. I'm sick of wojack edits and usually avoid them, but when in Rome

>Hundreds of other comments.
>Focuses only on the bad ones.
Why do artists do this?

Yeah, it wasn't that bad though my issue with the "problematic" argument is that all of it is related to what they feel hits "close to home" with an arbitrary line on what sort of content even is "problematic".

Like yeah, RLM occasionally makes fun of women but for every women joke they have 10 jokes making fun of the elderly. Why is making fun of one group considered more heinous then the other?

It's been a few years and I've had some time to mill over this situation:
I don't think the women are wrong to complain, but I do think they're wrong for trying to police the behavior of men. Even the annoying ones. I think the problem here is that in the online space they've always assumed the direct responsibility of men to change and assumed 0 responsibility for themselves to police 'their' state.

Like, online you have almost complete and total control over who can say what to you, what messages you see, your experience is incredibly easy to manage and groom. But for some reason these tools are never good enough for these people complaining?
Just block people and move on. I still don't understand why that's so hard. Block people. Ignore people. You can't ever 100% dictate what other people do, but you've already got a lot of tools to help you control your experiences.

>I'm sorry I said anything
No, this comic is 100% correct. Sometimes you just need to know when to deflate conflicts. Fucking Bikecuck proved most trolls only really pursue a person if you tell them they're wrong. If you tell them their viewpoints are valid, they usually just go "okay" and don't feel the need to keep hammering it in. Hell, the only reason Andrew Dobson is still the most hated person on the internet after over a decade is that he just keeps spouting controversial opinions, then telling people to shut up.

Although I doubt the artist was self-aware to be going for that message.

That's a lot of panels to say something that requires only one

Attached: 1b4.png (810x330, 27.31K)

Women have a huge effect on society

Which female internet artist would you legit fuck, Yas Forums?

Hmm, let's see

>woman using man-made internet
She loses this battle by default, no one invited her, no one asked her to become a public figure, she willingly became one

>the roastie fears the bromance
Nuff said

>I am right!!!!
>can't make a real argument
>proceeds to project female reactions to things not going their way on males
Women are much more prone to tantrums and are far more entitled than men could ever hope to be

She makes it appear that men and women are uniform masses with diametrically opposed opinions, ignoring the existence of simps and cucks. If men all really acted like this, women wouldn't have a SINGLE right, and would be still locked up on the kitchen and being sex slaves, not posted retarded strawman comics on the internet. If only men actually WERE like this, the world would be a better place.

>Hundreds of people not shitting in my bed
>Focuses only on the one who shat in my bed
Why do people do this?

>they've always assumed the direct responsibility of men to change and assumed 0 responsibility for themselves to police 'their' state.
So the same as always

>Why is making fun of one group considered more heinous then the other?
I unironically hate women myself but I've read enough feminist theory shit to explain the reasoning-
They believe sexism is a pervasive force of violence upheld through constant small enforcement, so a joke about old people because IRL nobody's doing shit to old people (that's not actually true) is just a joke that psychologically dissipates instantly but every sexist joke helps adds a speckle of mortar to reinforce the wall of sexism.

Yes, they do, you absolute brainlet, it's new people who come trying to get a reaction after the previous set of people give up. Have you seriously not noticed that trolling problems are worse when people get pissy and respond to trolls like a retard?

All of them, I'm not handsome enough to be picky.
Except maybe the girl that makes one-half of Jaltoid. I'm more handsome then her spouse, but that's my limit.

I find this comic very problematic. The author assumes that person is sexist because he supposedly would like to use her vagina but,
1. What makes him want to fuck her is the quality of her comic, so he is complimenting her work and not her sexual qualities.
2. She is sexist and assumes that dude wants to fuck her (his comment is pretty unisex if you read it as it is), but he could as well not be aware of her gender and be gay on top of that.
Therefore, she is a sexist one and he is a victim here.

Attached: ecqogexmcqjhfqdy.jpg (300x168, 13.93K)

I don't hate women and women jokes don't make me want to start. I'm also fat and Hispanic and I enjoy a good fat Hispanic joke.

At the end of the day it's about tone and context.

Attached: Untitled.png (968x1514, 1.28M)

What is it that SJW's always say?
Oh right; "YOU HAVE NO RIGHT TO COMPLAIN BECAUSE IT'S NOT FOR YOU".

The internet isn't your living room

There was an Onion article: "Feminist turns off feminism to enjoy TV". And now it's reality.

Yas Forums about Awkward Zombie and Let's Speak English.

Trolling is a non-issue. It hurts as much as you are willing to put an effort into your response. Just come with something legit sounding, without investing much if at all and waste trolls time as much as possible.

Creator of Hazbin Hotel is a slampig.

I think it's true. Women have it harder, yeah.

Ultimately I think the problem is wanting to bring everybody together into a single, unified online space. Different groups and types of people need their seperate websites.

>skipping Hand Banana
philistine

No, Bikecuck made a retarded comic, but then realized "hey, you guys are right, that was pretty retarded of me", instead of quadrupling down on his retardation.

Attached: 1578103589720.jpg (989x989, 703.36K)

Of course, the problem with that is that it would make it more expensive for corporations to advertise on those websites because there would be more competition. The money is happy to keep things the way they are.

and where he is now
right, forgotten by everyone
dobson doubles down and a living legend

Zummeng

In OP's case, the latter.

I wish my comic making skills made someone want to fuck me

Now you see the glory of Art eugenics!

The problem you just described is identity politics, specialized marketing and safe spaces.
It's been scientifically proven already that modem people have actually gotten more angrier and partisan because website like Google, Facebook, Twitter, Youtuber and so on advertise specifically around the individuals own bias and thus individuals never have to actually go and discuss or see other peoples perceptions because it's way easier to just fall back on shit you already believe in.

has Katie Rice ever commented on all the porn of the cartoon version of her from Skadi?

Attached: 1487972743545.jpg (237x342, 34.35K)

I think you stretched things too thin

Is "sexism" just new puritanism? Wanting to fuck anyone isn't sexism. Being mad about someone who wants to fuck someone isn't anti-sexism.

Attached: sexism comic.png (950x1492, 1.13M)

>women have no power in society
>Women immediately after getting constitutional right to sufferage instantly passed a new Amendment which banned a whole catagory of drink which has remained popular for 10's of thousands of years before their country they come from even existed

You can only pick one.
Saying Women have no power in America is like saying the Catholic church has no political influence in Italy.