Rank 'em

Rank 'em

Attached: Screen Shot 2020-04-24 at 9.07.00 PM.png (1099x1054, 397.75K)

1. Nirvana
2. Beatles
3/4 - Never listened

Pink Floyd>Zep>Beatles>Nirvana

Pink>Beatles>Zeppelin>Nirvana

see how stupid that nirvana logo looks there, doesnt even belong among adult bands.

This is also acceptable although I think Zep is a bit more of a singles band than the Ringles

literal shit pop >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pink floyd >> beatles >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nirvana >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>led zeppelin

t. 35 year old

>led zeppelin better than the Beatles
Low IQ

Pink Floyd > Beatles > Led Zeppelin > Nirvana

Led Zeppelin is a cover band
Nirvana is one note
The Beatles have too much filler
Pink Floyd's "best" albums are actually their worst.

The Beatles > Pink Floyd > Nirvana > Led Zeppelin

All four are excellent bands, though.

Floyd > Zeppelin > Beatles > shitvana

pink floyd>the beatles>nirvana>z*ppelin

Based near-patrician

Beatles > Pink Floyd > Led Zeppelin = Nirvana

Attached: 08217252ff0eedabc262ba71be70503f.jpg (540x605, 51.31K)

but user that's a picture of the superior 60's band, The Rolling Stones & Jones

Floyd > Beatles > Zep > Nirvana

>God Tier:
>Top tier:
>Mid tier:
>Low tier:
>Shit tier: The Beatles, Led Zeppelin, Pink Floyd, Nirvana

Bands that should be banned from this board

pink floyd > nirvana > beatles > zep

Yes

my personal preference is
nirvana = beatles = syd barrett era pink floyd >>> led zeppelin >>> post-barrett pink floyd

Pink Floyd>Zeppelin>Nirvana>Beatles

My own tastes:

Zeppelin > Beatles > Floyd > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > who cares > > > > dogshit > > > > > > > cancer > > > > > > > > Nirvana

'Objectively':
Beatles > Zeppelin > Floyd > > > > > > > > > > Nirvana

Nirvana is objectively the worst band on there and anyone who doesn't think so has objectively garbage taste and should shoot their head off with an objective shotgun

>"Objectively"
>Pop music > Cover band > band that pioneered a genre whilst making original music > > > > > > > > > > band that pioneered a genre whilst making original music

Attached: eke.png (600x600, 140.78K)

The objective take coming through

The Beatles > Pink Floyd > Led Zeppelin > Nirvana

Someone must be wrong...

Floyd > Beatles > Zeppelin >>>> Nirvana

If you disagree you have bad taste

1. Beatles
2. Led Zeppelin (its close)
3. Pink Floyd
4. Nirvana (it isn't close)