Fucking rekt

fucking rekt

Attached: Screenshot_20200424-120851_Chrome.jpg (1079x1667, 666.87K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/vjIwmJMqrco?t=208
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

yeah but the stuff mick puts out now is this:

youtu.be/vjIwmJMqrco?t=208

And the Stones have been washed-up for decades while the Beatles quit at the height of their powers.

what the actual fuck is this jesus christ

did I just get mickrolled?

Is will.i.am/Black Eyed Peas the biggest joke in modern music?

kekt at fart music

Jesus Christ. There was a time when he was one of the coolest, sexiest, most lusted over man in the world

>i'm a go heard that's my thesis
>this beat is a shit (feces)
What the fuck was he thinking

>hard like geometry
>trigonometry
>this is crazy
>psychology

I'm in anguish

>hard like morning wood in the morning

A random track off revolver still makes Mccartney more money than literally the entire stones discography does for jagger.

he was always a fag

Just think about how satisfying and based it is that they broke up in '70. Had the whole world at their feet, giants of industry. Literally unstoppable and they said fuck you all and split

that fucking song

Attached: shaq.jpg (733x728, 41.26K)

And K-pop makes more money than both bands combined

you'd think people would universally know that popularity/being around a long time doesn't make something better by now

They were already falling off. Pink Floyd and Led Zeppelin were becoming the hot shit

and everyone says they need to quit touring because they're old and it's embarassing. even my baby boomer grandparents say mick jagger needs to stop kek

>an entire industry makes more money than two bands
Wow, you're some kind of accounting finance wizard.

pink floyd weren't really hot shit at that point were they?

>the other band doesn’t exist
gee I wonder what could’ve happened to the Beatles that made this happen???

The Beatles were more revolutionary sure. But they were mediocre at their instruments, and Paul wrote the majority of their good songs.

Rolling Stones were far more impressive as an outfit, and most importantly they rocked. Also nothing the beatles did is even close to Exile.

Stones have maybe 3 good albums which all have plenty of filler, while the Beatles never made a bad album once in ten years and even their filler is memorable

You know what I've changed my mind this song is amazing. It's like a parody of 2010s butt-pop, the awful sawtooth baseline synth, the beep-boop melody, the quarter-baked lyrics, the cameos by two wash-ups, the fucking will.i.am spaceship. Immaculately gauche.

For the fourteen years Fergie was a member, absolutely. Now that she's gone they regressed back to where they started: a mediocre hip-hop trio.

>Beatles never made a bad album once in ten years and even their filler is memorable
If you ignore everything before Rubber Soul, maybe.

Exile doesnt have filler and neither does Sticky Fingers

>The beatles never made a bad album
Every album pre-1965 is pretty bad
>Filler is memorable
Some of it is, but this is also because they were just so popular that their filler became popular.

THE

HARDEST

Homo

FACT

Don't sign your posts

lol BTFO