Why come you kids like the beatles more than the stones?

Stones were a great band but they didn't do anything innovative

>all this talk about the “unique”, creative sound of The Beatles
Except that NOTHING sounded like The Stones prior to bands such as The Faces/Rod Stewart, The Modern Lovers/Johnny Thunders, Flamin Groovies, The Jacobites and several more 70’s bands practically stealing their signature sound/style. The Stones brought Rock N’ Roll to soaring heights, that have yet to be reached

Because Rolling Stones actually made music for chads. Beatles are soibois.

I mean this completely unironically.

I don't think they're better than The Beatles but it'd undeniable the influence they had. Mick Jagger as frontman specifically seems like it set the tone for all other rock frontman after.

they weren't even a good band
the records were ok
they've always sounded shit live
bad band

>has zero balls
>hugs pillow to sleep

haha england amirite

I hug my big fat tits to sleep

Because even Paul's granny tunes are more interesting than blooze rawk.

Unrelated but whenever I see that picture of Mick Jagger I think it's Bill Bruford.

Because Psychedelic Rock>Blues Rock

The Stones are better than the Beatles

Beatles were actual talent and soul. Stones sold their soul to the devil for fame and it shows.

Early Stones doesn't sound any different to the other rhythm and blues bands that had been around.

The Stones were the first true rock band. Aerosmith, AC/DC...they all looked at the Stones for guidance. That's what he means.

No but he certainly raped A LOT of girls.

nit wit

No but Charlie Watts did punch Jagger that one time
It's not rape if they consented

Nice argument. Seriously, listen to anything besides the Beatles.

so many books yada yada you know this

>It's not rape if they consented
Why would you feel the need to ask such an immature question anyway? Rockstars like Jagger, Lennon and the like get EVERYTHING and anything they want when they want. You really think nobody got hurt? Grow up faggot.

Attached: 1586017554558.jpg (1125x766, 60.67K)

No, user. Nobody got hurt. Else it would have been known.

yeah I'm just dying to listen to some shitty stones cover bands like aerosmith ac/dc and the new york dolls I'll get right on it

lel okay

So if women come forward and say Jagger raped them you'll be believing them right? Cause they made it be known?

growing up means
>realizing the stones were actually writing about real life and the beatles wrote mostly derpy love songs;
>realizing the stones played with fire and passion and found grooves that impressed their black idols and that beatles 'musicality' was actually george martins;
>realizing that the stones were the sound of brothers who although fought and cursed at eachother could still put differences aside and play and record pure ecstatic rocknroll that provoked culture and the beatles are the sound of 4 egotistical passive aggressive pissbaby betas who barely spoke to eachother during their creative peak and barely made up after the fact;
>realizing that the stones immediately influenced rock n roll by emphasizing its dark and immoral nature in mankind and that beatles mostly influenced preppy trend seeking forgotten pop groups.

Yeah because that's what happens to actual rapists like Cosby and Weinstein.

>NOOOO SHE WAS JUST 16 SHE COULDN'T ACTUALLY CONSENT NOOOO
Fuck off, prude.

>Else it would have been known.
kek no

jagger's not a rapist. insatiable, but no rapist.

Yeah i would believe them. If they showed proof. The thing is why would you think Jagger held some woman on the ground and put his dick inside her while she screamed and begged to stop?. That's what rape is, i don't think he did ever that.