Well?

well?

Attached: Question_mark.jpg (488x842, 113.37K)

The people he jacked off in front of consented, they only regretted it later. Why would he need to apologize?

Because it's a fucking gross, creepy, somewhat predatory behavior and arguably count as cheating.

>NOOOOOOO CONSENT AND CONTEXT DOESN'T MATTERR!!!!!!
>WHAT DO YOU MEAN I CANT REVOKE CONSENT YEARS AFTER THE FACT???? I WANT MUH PAYCHECK

why is kink shaming so ok now? louie cant help what hes into and he literally did nothing against anyones will or illegally,

all these lesser people are just frothing at the chance to take a shot at a once in a generation tier talent, always happens

It's degenerate

I do think it's fucking weird but from what I understand they all consented. why? because they wanted something from him. that's what I hate about the me too movement. yeah weinstein was a pig but you knew something like that would happen when you got into the medium. most of these "victims" sold their souls to the devil and now they are crying about it. give me a fucking break. be an adult and be accountable of your decisions.

>once in a generation tier talent
ok lets not exagerate, he's just a comedian. That is one of the easiest jobs in entertainment.

i don't care

So women can twerk, flick their bean, show off their tits, and even make jerk off gestures and it's empowering, but a man jerks of and he is a creepy. Fuck this double standard

who?

Why do they denigrate some degenerate fetishes while celebrating others?

She can’t just accept the attention after getting a 10/10 now she needs to beat a dead horse

how do you know they consented? why do you assume they consented? being locked in a room and having someone jack off in front of you is traumatizing. it is sexual assault.

Who gives a hoot you fucking burger.

they do it with consent. thats the difference. there is no double standard

gross and creepy merely constitutes kink shaming. many if not most people have kinks that would be gross and creepy to people that don't share it, but bottom line it's a sex act like any other, maybe even less harmful than most. to say it's predory I think is a stretch in most of the public record stories, except the one on the set of whatever movie it was he was producer of, maybe Pootie Tang? Him being the boss and at work was definitely uncool. And cheating is also I think wrong but in a different and more complicated way, we don't know much about the inside of his marriage at the time. But the comedian songwriters went up to a peers hotel room after drinks and consented to a sex act. I don't think that qualifies as even misconduct, because that is specifically how you're supposed to conduct sex.

Uh, no they didn't.

decent bait but a little too on the nose

you can literally never have a subordinate consent for sex because of the power imbalance, or so they say

how the fuck do you know they consented to that act???????? plus??? kink always involves consent. thats the point of CNC (consensual non-consensual) and safe words are involved. instead he locked coworkers in his room and fucking jacked off in front of them. thats not consensual or kinkshaming
>on the nose
describing sexual assault as sexual assault is on the nose? jesus christ

if they consented they would not revoke consent post the event.

do you really love CK so much that you cant believe he would commit such an abhorrent act? i dont get it? are you in denial that sexual assault is a huge issue that happens fucking daily? to men and women?

>give consent as functioning adults capable of walking out at any time
>later say that you didnt REALLY mean yes and you meant NO but were to scared to say NO at the time
jesus christ how is any man supposed to win with these fucking retarded rules
>i gave you no possible indication that what you did was wrong at the time
>no go die because of it

>describing sexual assault as sexual assault is on the nose? jesus christ
Your moral indignation is no jurisprudence.

people can be coerced into sexual assault it happens all the time. you read the room. you arent a fucking psychopath. thats how you live. consent is not complicated.

>say yes and give no possible indication to the other person that akchtually, you meant no
>go to prison for not being a fucking mind reader
god youre retarded

That is something that is just starkly untrue imo. There are instances where power is tangible, but often times "power", yes in scare quotes, is a nebulous thing that can be framed in infinite ways. In the case where it's unambiguous, like a employer/employee relationship, I would still say that it's not intrinsically non-consensual. But certainly complicated and often unwise.

This continues to be bait.

did ck go to prison? lol he still has a career. what are you crying about and why are you defending him and other sexual assaulters so much? there are ways to read body language and also simply NOT coerce people into sexual acts. look up rape/sexual assault by coercion. its a thing. hope you get help

“Contrary to Breslin’s accounting, what C.K. did was not done with consent,” she wrote. “We never agreed nor asked him to take all his clothes off and masturbate to completion in front of us. But it didn’t matter because the exciting part for him was the fear on our faces.”

can this discussion end???? they never consented

you sound like a woman