IFM / Intelligent Fascist Music

>Intelligent
>Fascist
you cannot choose both at the same time

i wonder if this guy drives a ford

This argument doesn't fly in a time when anyone can just look up and read fascist intellectuals.

>fascism
>intelligent

pick one and only one. every fascist i've ever conversed and debated with has literally no theory beyond fetishizing a past which likely never existed on top of vague rhetoric that's only meant to sugarcoat their true aims. it's basically "feels over reals": the ideology.

david tibet is not a fascist. shows what you know.

>fascist intellectuals

Attached: 1586150002328.jpg (224x225, 4.37K)

you're simply lying to yourself if you think the majority of fascist idelogues both historically speaking and currently speaking give a flying shit about reading political theory.

IFM / Intelligent Feminist Music

Attached: crass.jpg (1000x1000, 719.9K)

literal historical revisionism, Mussolini was immersed in socialist theory and wrote the proverbial fascist rulebook, and hitler spent most of his time doing much of the same with social democracy and the anti-Semitic third-positionism and german nationalism of the time

the album is a warning against fascism and other totalitarian regimes you ponce

some more IFM / Intelligent Feminist Music

Attached: knife.jpg (660x660, 57.08K)

what godawful reading comprehension you have. i said that the majority of fascist adherents don't care about reading political theory (did you fucking forget that a lot of common citizens were fascists and nazis in the 1930s?) and you reply by mentioning two historical leaders? unbelievable stupidity.

I really don't care about your debate experiences.
>david tibet is not a fascist
I never implied he was.

I never implied they did, neither does the majority of the left, but both side have and always had their intellectual elements.

>the majority of fascist adherents don't care about reading political theory
Then what was even your point in bringing that up? How is that relevant to the thread? Are you just here to vent?

>I never implied he was
then don't post that album, because it doesn't promote fascism by any means
>neither does the majority of the left
whatever "the left" even means to you, you vague loser. we're talking about a single right-wing ideology and you want to paint the majority of "the left" as non-readers?

because no german citizens bought mein kampf and it was never a best seller

mein kampf became a best seller solely because it was given to every newly wed couple. this is basic nazi-era history, son.

my point was that most adherents of fascism (whether they wish to admit they are or not) are unintelligent and have zero theory, obviously.

A socially isolated and hilariously bitter manchild's ideology, for sure.

How is that relevant again? The majority of anti-fascists are not intellectual, neither the majority of Marxists. This is the internet age: even the majority of Deleuzians will adopt that label because they heard him mentioned in a video essay and read a botched summary of his work on some hipster blog. This does not mean that intellectual anti-fascists/Marxists/Deleuzians do not exist - it just means that statements about the majority of adherents of any ideology are irrelevant in this context.

i'm glad you can admit that the majority of fascists are nowhere near intellectual.

Did you just try to turn this into a victory for yourself? I'm glad you're not stupid enough to openly deny the existence of intellectual fascists. I hope you're smart enough to realize that whatever prominent ideology you adhere to (if you do), the majority of your allies are nowhere near intellectual.