Why are female musicians such whores? why is it hard for them to keep on their clothes and just preform their music...

Why do you care so much. It's part of the performance, their onstage persona. Male musician can expose their chest, perform in their underwear and no one seems to care why can you do the same for female musicians

Because society rewards women for the beauty above all else.

it's almost like I'm talking about a specific yet numberous group of people that shares both opinions

Based and truthpilled

yes those are confused teenagers, there are no teenagers on Yas Forums

Ignore that last bit, I'm fucking retarded

so their onstage persona is undressing? come on now.

>WAAAH why are hot women showing me their bodies?
Signs you might be gay

Capitalism. Sex sells.

you need more real life. if you found out the internet was making your brain less healthy, would you cut back on your internet time?

Triggering sensitive faggots like you, while you simultaneously get your dicks out, seems like a good reason for me

Attached: 6ro5mp313dx2.jpg (532x800, 71.25K)

if I wanted hot women showing me their bodies I'd watch porn

Entertainers are spiritual and moral prostitutes. In the cases of St. Vincent or that disgusting Albanian, the outside merely matches the inside.
Despite the line Pitchfork is feeding you, you shouldn't conflate entertainers with actual artists. Also, you will not read about actual artists on Pitchfork.

Do you always create a convenient portrait of someone so you can focus on that instead of whatever subject you're talking about?

fucking this. it's why all pop artist sexualize themselves. do people honestly even care about their music?

because society rewards it and you consciously crave it
these threads are right next to eachother, I didn't have to do anything, people just like sex

Attached: sexy.png (541x342, 167.32K)

>Triggering sensitive faggots like you, while you simultaneously get your dicks out, seems like a good reason for me

Attached: 1555472029375.webm (720x720, 765.24K)

You do that anyway.

I feel like you deliberately try to misunderstand what I say

An American just brought something blacked related to this thread. There's no point even posting anymore.

absolutely based

I literally started that meme, don't even try to use it on me.

Thanks for proving my point, but you don't need to display your fetishes like that

Angel Olsen doesn't do that

because they're women. the funny thing about this feminist bullshit is we've forgotten what women are. women are sexual in nature. i'm not saying that all women are whores. but women are women.

what point? women are slut and do it for the money.

I wish I could make every man on earth as unhorny as me. All of societies problems would be fixed instantly

Attached: 149EFB93-880F-48DC-8FCA-8C80A5009A5F.jpg (775x837, 49.47K)

based impotent homosexual

maybe they like looking good idk cry about it

Sex sells. it's the reason why artist like At Vincent and Arianna Grande have many listener while someone like Alexandra Savoir can't reach their number despite making better music

Attached: Alexandra-Savior-CREDIT-Joshua-Abels-1200x800.jpg (711x474, 65.1K)

ok incel, keep crying about women and posting your favourite ebin blacked memes all day long

Fuck off back to work Alexandra

ok incel

Ironically the female gaze wants to see the same thing as the male gaze. So these women with largely female fan-bases can get more attention the same way they would get attention from men. But they would only be whores and sluts if they were doing it for men which they are not.

>can't sell something that's got no appeal to it
woah

>discount lana

so the best thing a women should do is get undressed for the sake of their music? wow, good job sticking it to the man

you incels sound upset, is it because she doesn't prance around on stage in her underwear?

No, just saying being a more talented artist means nothing if you dont know how to sell it. Be it with your body or not. Anyway, Lana del Rey did it which makes me think your precious nobody is simply not that good.

>are you upset this artist no one's heard of is supposedly better than this other artist
Not really

If the music is good enough, they don’t have to. See: weyes blood, julia holter, grouper, etc

>popular equals to greatness
Savoir's marketing isn't bad, she had her song played on Celine a very famous high fashion brand that got her some fans, but any artist will tell you getting a big fan base is hard and just because someone has a bigger one than some else doesn't mean their music is better. if we follow that logic then Drake is a better artist than every Yas Forumscore artist.

Thought it's not a rule it is the case here. Lana is better.

Because they can't rely only in their...talent. They have to show off too. This is not exclusive to women, but you see more of them doing it than dudes.

>why are female musicians such whores?
Never generalize things, user
>why is it hard for them to keep on their clothes and just preform their music?
Why do you care really?
>why must they sexualize themselves?
'them' (untalented artists) need marketing gimmicks to call attention to their mediocre music, or maybe they're just narcissistic fucks

seethe more alexandra

Well, women have a bigger area of their bodies sexualized
You won't say some dude's a whore for playing shirtless

Why do men get so easily shaken by sexy women? Even when men act like manhoes on stage women, at best, enjoy it without losing sleep over why they do it.
To answer OP: it's more effective. Nowadays a lot of female artists slut it up on the stage and everyone (men and women) enjoys it.

99% of them are talent less and sex sells. simple as that.

>'them' (untalented artists) need marketing gimmicks to call attention to their mediocre music, or maybe they're just narcissistic fucks
exactly

Blame the madonna/whore complex western society was built on