Radiohead hate thread

I hate this shit band so fucking much.

Attached: 1532973833920.jpg (800x450, 125.38K)

Blow it out your ass

Attached: C027D0E0-C907-4586-8D7D-1022DA733905.jpg (505x604, 79.66K)

OMG THEY ARE SO EXPERIMENTAL

Attached: soiy.jpg (600x600, 33.71K)

Me too lad
Tom dork and the radiobutts never wrote a good song in their LIFE

explain

Based.
Radiohead is music for people who can't look the cashier in the eye.

i don't get the appeal, they're so zzz and if you want 'experimental' go listen to some jazz or classical

Attached: 220px-Free_Jazz_-_A_Collective_Improvisation.jpg (220x222, 20.94K)

Rubber Soul > ok computer

what a shit band FUCK

Me too. The only band that’s worse than them is Animal Collective.

I dont listen to them so much, but most of the albums i listened to are somehow over average by a little bit, i dont really get what is so special about them

The Trickster is the only Radiohead song I've liked, anything else like it?

it's not a coincidence that Johnny Greenwood excelled in film scores when a limit and rules is placed on him

Zoomers filtered oh no no no

good for you lmao

Only Radiohead songs i've ever liked are No Surprises and Motion Picture Soundtrack.
No Surprises for being a very good pop song hidden under layers of pseudointellectual bullshjit
Motion Picture Soundtrack for simply being a really good fucking song. best thing radiohead ever did.

Listen to Muse - Absolution, they based their entire sound on the Trickster.

I can't stand Matt Bellamy's voice, he makes me appreciate Thom

imagine being this much of a cuck ass retard to think so much about things you dislike
get some help nigga

Rate my Radiohead ranking

Attached: Capture.jpg (629x429, 35.75K)

Coldplay > Gaydioehad

Cringe. Everything should be 0.5/5 like mine.

ITT:
>they are bad because i dont like them
>thom yorke is a cuck
>they are fake experimental
>zzz
I mean can you faggots actually make a cogent fucking argument or are you going to continue sucking each other's microdicks?

They sound like shit to me, that's why I dislike them
I don't need to write an essay to justfiy my distaste for them.
Kill yourself numale faggot.

>hurr durr bad because bad durr hurr
Point well made, retard.

Post favorite bands

Fucking overrated shitty pretentius band for nu males and arthoes

>Public Image Ltd.
>The Fall
>The Beatles
>The Velvet Underground
>Jorge Ben

Their sound is the epitome of style over substance, I'd rather listen to hey jude than some tuneless rant about iPhones

1000x this.

>tuneless rant about iPhones
this is the small brain's take from ok computer

>IT'S ACTUALLY A VERY DEEP TAKE ON TECHNOLOGY AND HOW IT'S MAKING ME LONELY AND CRAZY

Attached: 1582917252431.png (600x800, 50.3K)

Thom yorke's hooks dont fucking stick, he's using the pop song vernacular ineffectively.

>I DONT ACTUALLY HAVE TO MAKE A POINT BECAUSE I CAN DISMISS YOU BY SAYING YOU LOVE ONIONS
>Thom yorke's hooks dont fucking stick,
>creep
>high and dry
>fake plastic trees
>airbag
>let down
>karma police
>no surprises
I can keep going if you want

Jesus christ what is sticky about karma police? Listen to Happy Together by the turtles

You'd think completely ripping off Can and being fucking shit would be mutually exclusive, but Radiohead somehow manage it.

I mean it's probably their second most popular single behind Creep

Kek
Let's not forget they ripped John Lennon once as well.

Yeah but they'd be way bigger than they are now if they'd just stuck to making actually sticky hooks like creep

everyone in modern music rips off john lennon
shitty point is shitty

>Yeah but they'd be way bigger than they are now if they'd just stuck to making actually repetitive easily accessible pop music that me and my dad can listen to on the ride to the grocery store
ftfy

Radiohead is literally pseud music its pseudo-experimental and pseudo-pop without excelling at either. Something like Laughing stock or tago mago can actually be said to expand the idea of what rock or Song based music can be Through means of serious experimentation, there is nothing risky or challenging in radiohead's music, there is only a dark brown sheen of le angst applied to vasectomy'd radio rock.

>everyone in modern music rips off john lennon
How?

They seamlessly fused rock and electronic music in a way that easily surged the entire genre into the 00s without issue.
Which, by the way, was a time when the reminisce of grunge was still in the zeitgeist and was met with boomer flipping the fuck out about how "keyboards are real instruments" and "electronic music isn't real music"
Of course NOW it's not challenging, that the entire fucking point

>NOW its not challenging
No thats because it was a cheap gimmick that wore off easily. People still discuss if late Picasso paintings are amateurish crap or visionary masterpieces, some 50 Years after the man croaked. The shock doesnt wear off with truly subversive or ground breaking art

Nice dodge
The world is more connected than ever before, genres change faster, this is why rap has a new trend every two weeks.
Our fifteen minutes of fame are now five seconds, get with the times faggot

*rips off 90s electronic music for rockists in your path*

Attached: Radiohead-1-768x435.jpg (768x435, 44.78K)

Failing to make out any coherence in your post buddy

Because you're fucking retarded
You dodged over half of my post then can't reason past first order logic on the one part you sniped

Post your top ten Radiohead songs

1. I Might Be Wrong
2. Morning Bell / Amnesiac
3. A Punch Up at a Wedding
4. Worrywort
5. Let Down
6. Idioteque
7. Reckoner
8. Life in a Glasshouse
9. Cuttooth
10. Motion Picture Soundtrack

Yeah look obviously radiohead are greatly successful and have staid relevant for very long, what i'm saying is that Their successes are largely based on aesthetical grounds and not so much on merits of quality. They were obviously in the right place at the right time, but looking back on their most acclaimed work, to me at least it's pretty apparent they cant write a great Song, so they use cheaper tricks to stimulate the listener. We can really use the Beatles as a good example of the exact opposite, Not much aesthetic but a lot of substance, which makes them produce wildly different tracks such as here comes the sun and I wan you shes so heavy on the same fucking LP since theyre Not bothered with uuuh is it gloomy enough?

>retard
>Beatles fanboy
Checks out.

Thom Yorke beat his wife

Enjoy your flavorless alt "angst"

>they use cheaper tricks to stimulate the listener
>if they'd just stuck to making actually sticky hooks like creep
Pick one
Also, being unconventional isn't a trick if you actually contribute to pushing popular music in a different direction through experimentation
Fake experimentation would be like Jaden Smith or XXX
>the Beatles
>Not much aesthetic but a lot of substance
How fucking retarded can you be?
A MASSIVE part of the Beatles was their aesthetic musically and visually, they invented the entire concept of eras in music, along with David Bowie.

Yes, I think I will.

The Beatles weren't fucking preoccupied with does it sound artsy or angsty enough, they were just bothered with if it was a good song or not. Its like paint a Grey canvas that expresses ur terrible emotional state, i'm still gonna get more out of looking at monet's water lillies because that's how art works.

>art is better without focus
You could extend that logic to mean you dislike concept albums, how ironic, Beatles faggot.

You are assuming a lot about people you’ve never met

God i hate radiohead